Man hits back at bosses for telling him to remove his make-up at work

"You can’t tone down a masterpiece"

Scott Laplanche says he felt discriminated against by his employers after being asked to remove his make-up at work
Scott Laplanche says he felt discriminated against by his employers after being asked to remove his make-up at work

A male shop worker has criticised his bosses after claiming he was reprimanded for wearing make-up at work.

But his employer, Currys PC World, has insisted that it was a store-level misunderstanding, and that the company is "proud of its diverse workforce".

Scott Laplanche, 20, from Wakefield, West Yorkshire, says that while he was at work, he was asked to remove his make-up, and believes the request was discriminatory given that his female colleagues “wear more make-up than he does.”

Messy desks could be a sign of genius

Although he had worked in the shop for around nine months and had never been told off for wearing make-up before, Laplanche says that new management told him to remove it completely. After refusing, they then told him to “tone it down.”

Maddened by the request, Laplanche took to Facebook to share his disdain, which has since been shared more than 3,000 times.

“Before I explain my frustrations, you need to bear in mind that.. There isn’t any make-up policy at work,” he wrote.

“Also, a lot of my female colleagues wear more makeup than I do.

“With that in mind, I’ve been working here for about 8/9months and I’ve never been reprimanded on my makeup before. Actually quite the opposite.. some managers have supported me and complimented my makeup.

“However recently we’ve had to go under new management.

“Earlier on in the week I came to work as my fabulous self and was told to take off my makeup.

“I was quite shocked… After I refused, I’m getting told to tone it down? Excuse me? Tone it down? You can’t tone down a masterpiece.

“I felt this was discriminatory?”

Laplanche went on to explain that he shouldn’t have to take off his make-up while his female colleagues are able to come to work wearing it.

And he also included an image he claims was taken moments after the disagreement showcasing a fairly natural make-up look.

“‘This is 2017, a time of year where we celebrate Pride throughout summer and I look hella hot so deal with it!” he added.

“It’s wrong to blatantly discriminate for whatever reason that may be.”

A spokesman for Currys PC World said: "This was a local store level misunderstanding that is being dealt with internally. Scott takes pride in his appearance and Currys PC World is proud of its diverse workforce."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in