Stella McCartney perfume block bid fails

Cathy Gordon,Press Association
Thursday 20 August 2009 12:46
Comments

A High Court bid to block this weekend's launch of Stella McCartney's latest perfume failed today.

The legal move was made by a cosmetics company linked to the wife of U2 frontman Bono arising out of a trademark dispute over the use of the word "nude".

Fashion designer McCartney's launch of her new eau de toilette, STELLANUDE, is scheduled in the UK for this Saturday.

But a judge in London refused to grant an interim injunction to Nude Brands Limited (NBL), which it sought pending a full trial of their claim for alleged trademark infringement.

Nude Brands, run by eco-entrepreneur Bryan Meehan and Bono's wife Ali Hewson, described as an "investor and muse" of the company, is the owner of a registered trademark for the word NUDE - in capital letters - for a large range of goods and services including cosmetics and perfumery.

Mr Justice Floyd said the company's application for an interim injunction was to restrain Stella McCartney Limited (SML), YSL Beaute Limited and L'Oreal (UK) from "infringing" the trade mark registration "for the word 'NUDE' by applying the sign 'STELLANUDE' to perfume products".

Ruling on the application, he said: "I have come to the conclusion that the balance of injustice in this case requires me to refuse the injunction.

"It seems to me that, in this particular case, the likely damage to SML and L'Oreal if an injunction is wrongly granted outweighs the damage to NBL if it is refused."

He said: "The effect of an injunction wrongly granted against SML would be to cause a massive disruption to their business, and probably cause them to abandon use of the brand altogether."

A full trial of the action - unless the parties settle in the meantime - is expected to be heard next year.

An interim injunction would have meant the launch of the new perfume being postponed pending the dispute being fully aired in court.

Mr Justice Floyd said that currently NBL's range includes cleansers, moisturisers, eye care products, face masks, body lotions and supplements.

It has never marketed a NUDE perfume, but "intends to do so".

The judge said that NBL's products were sold in the "mid to high end of the market, at retail outlets such as Harvey Nichols, Selfridges and Space NK".

NBL's products had achieved UK sales on a retail basis of about £150,000 in 07/08, £420,000 in 08/09 and £140,000 in the first quarter of 09/10.

Stella McCartney Limited and L'Oreal "are now proposing to sell an eau de toilette and a scented linen spray under the name STELLANUDE. It is this which gives rise to the complaint in this action".

Mr Justice Floyd said: "It is clear that the intended launch of the STELLANUDE products is to be on a substantial scale.

"Some 4.8 million euros (£4.1 million) worth of product at wholesale prices has been manufactured for worldwide distribution."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in