Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The blissful silence of a peaceful meal for one

Amsterdam's "individual dining concept" restaurant, Eenmaal, will pop up in London's Soho to "encourage Brits to reclaim their lunch breaks and enjoy fresh cuisine, with a side order of 'temporary disconnection'"

Samuel Muston
Friday 16 January 2015 01:00 GMT
Comments
Do not disturb: solo dining can be a joy
Do not disturb: solo dining can be a joy (Alamy)

When, in the course of Brideshead Revisited, Charles Ryder returns home to his family's house in Bayswater, his mandarin-like father – who, we are told, was gleeful but once, when he found "two pages of second-century papyrus between the leaves of a Lombardic Breviary" – does not flatter his son with a great deal of attention. Short of ready money, Ryder spends the long days at home. And meal times become the battle ground of their relationship.

After bestowing a brief, flickering burst of attention on his son, père Ryder picks up his book, props it against the epergne and continues to ignore his son for several more pages.

From this, we are presumably supposed to infer a lack of filial love, a disregard for the niceties of civilised society – and an overwhelming desire to drive Charles out of the house, in the same way that he saw off his "kindly" sister. I think, however, Mr Ryder's reputation needs to be revised – upwards.

Sometimes, in fact quite often, I long to sit alone in a restaurant with a book propped up against the pepper mill – not many places go in for epergnes these days, more's the pity – ignoring the world. And in this, I cannot be alone.

Two weeks from now, on 29 and 30 January, Amsterdam's "individual dining concept" restaurant, Eenmaal, will pop up in London's Soho to "encourage Brits to reclaim their lunch breaks and enjoy fresh cuisine, with a side order of 'temporary disconnection'". It is, as you might expect, part of a marketing campaign, in this instance for Glaceau Smart Water. But that shouldn't make us think ill of the idea, necessarily.

Dining is a great social occasion, that hardly needs saying. Bereft of dinner, most of us would hardly see our friends. It is so much more civilised than the drink in the bar, with all the drunkenness and chair-searching that calls for; and so much better than the theatre or the cinema for those of us who want to chat. And yet, sometimes, as Greta Garbo blurted, "I want to be alone."

We have fallen victim to all those olive oil adverts and American sitcoms that show gormless families all sitting around a table, smiling and general implying that to be alone at meal times is a stain on the moral character.

The thing is, no one wants to spend every single meal time alone, flicking idly through the pages of a newspaper, looking for a face to stare at while we eat our ham salad. But equally, do we have to be surrounded by a constant clamour of voices to be happy?

Often, I feel like a person without skin, at the mercy of all the various intruding information that a person with Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and various news apps is heir to, and the fact is, I often don't remove myself from their reach. They are ever-present companions.

The only time when I am away from them is when I eat. So what better time to be alone?

What better time to be disconnected not just from world of email and tweets, but to be disconnected from all humanity's din?

Sometimes, it's best to sit down, switch off and stay deliciously silent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in