Google workers resign in protest as AI experts call for end to autonomous weapons project
'We believe that Google should not be in the business of war'
Artificial intelligence researchers have called on Google to abandon a project developing AI technology for the military, warning that autonomous weapons directly contradict the firm’s famous ‘Don’t Be Evil’ motto.
The experts join more than 3,100 of Google’s own employees, who signed an open letter last month protesting the company’s involvement in a controversial Pentagon program called Project Maven.
The partnership between the technology giant and the US Military involves using customised AI surveillance software to analyse data from drone footage in order to better recognise target objects, such as distinguishing between a human on the ground and a vehicle.
Around a dozen employees have reportedly resigned in protest at Google’s refusal to cut ties with the US military, each one citing ethical concerns to Gizmodo. Google did not respond to a request for comment from The Independent.
In their letter last month to Google CEO Sundar Pichai, the employees wrote: "We believe that Google should not be in the business of war... We cannot outsource the moral responsibility of our technologies to third parties."
The researchers warn that the military could ultimately remove human oversight from drone strikes entirely, if Google’s technology proves effective.
“As military commanders come to see the object recognition algorithms as reliable, it will be tempting to attenuate or even remove human review and oversight for these systems,” the letter states.
“If ethical action on the part of tech companies requires consideration of who might benefit from a technology and who might be harmed, then we can say with certainty that no topic deserves more sober reflection - no technology has higher stakes - than algorithms meant to target and kill at a distance and without public accountability.”
In pictures: Artificial intelligence through history
In pictures: Artificial intelligence through history
1/7 Boston Dynamics
2/7 Google's self-driving cars
3/7 DARPA Urban Challenge
4/7 Deep Blue beats Kasparov
5/7 Watson wins Jeopardy
6/7 Apple's Siri
7/7 Kinect
1/7 Boston Dynamics
2/7 Google's self-driving cars
3/7 DARPA Urban Challenge
4/7 Deep Blue beats Kasparov
5/7 Watson wins Jeopardy
6/7 Apple's Siri
7/7 Kinect
Other fears detailed in the letter include the possibility of Google integrating the personal data of its users with military surveillance data for the purpose of targeted killing.
The use of such data would violate the public trust that is fundamental to the operation of Google’s business and would put the lives and human rights of its users in jeopardy, according to the researchers.
"The responsibilities of global companies like Google must be commensurate with the transnational makeup of their users," the letter states.
"While Google regularly decides the future of technology without democratic public engagement, its entry into military technologies casts the problems of private control of information infrastructure into high relief."
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.