Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tiktok ban postponed by judge as national security concerns deemed ‘hypothetical’

The 'government’s own descriptions of the national security threat posed by the TikTok app are phrased in the hypothetical’, the judge said

Adam Smith
Monday 02 November 2020 11:15 GMT
Comments
(Getty Images)

A federal judge has raised an injunction against the Trump administration’s ban on TikTok, stopping it from being banned in the country on 12 November.

The US government had repeatedly argued that TikTok is a national security concern due to its Chinese parent company and the claimed potential of Beijing using the app to harvest data.

TikTok has repeatedly denied such claims.

In this ruling, US district judge Wendy Beetlestone decided the Trump administration did not have enough evidence to ban the viral video app.

The “government’s own descriptions of the national security threat posed by the TikTok app are phrased in the hypothetical”, the judge said.

The ruling went on to say that the risk was not substantiated enough to be in the pubic interest, in comparison to the needs of its users.

Those users include a group of three TikTok creators, who brought the case to the court arguing that a ban would result in them losing access to sponsorship deals and other income.

These creators used the platform to spread “informational materials”, and as such banning the app would shut down their freedom of expression on the platform.

“We are deeply moved by the outpouring of support from our creators, who have worked to protect their rights to expression, their careers, and to help small businesses, particularly during the pandemic”, TikTok said in a statement.

“We stand behind our community as they share their voices, and we are committed to continuing to provide a home for them to do so." 

TikTok’s lawyer, Ambika Kumar Doran, said that she was "pleased that the judge has halted this ban, which exceeds the President’s authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, namely portions of the Act that reflect our nation’s deep commitment to free speech,” in a prepared statement

Nevertheless, this ruling is only a preliminary injunction – meaning the app could still face a ban in the US at a later date.

However, it is unclear how such a ban would progress should Donald Trump lose the election to Democrat Joe Biden after the presidential election on 3 November.

Biden has said that TikTok is a “matter of genuine concern” and pledged to review security risks around the app.

This is not the only lawsuit facing the Trump administration over its TikTok ban.

In August 2020, TikTok said it would sue the US government over the potential ban, saying it had “no choice” but to challenge the order “to ensure that the rule of law prevails and that our company and users are treated fairly”. 

The company could also work with Oracle which, along with Walmart, could acquire 20 per cent of TikTok, although it is not yet known whether such a structure would address the government’s national security concerns

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in