Research has established that the likelihood of misdiagnosis rises by 42 per cent if a patient is “difficult”
Research has established that the likelihood of misdiagnosis rises by 42 per cent if a patient is “difficult”

Doctors 'more likely to misdiagnose patients' if they are 'difficult'

Study finds patients who obstruct clinicians' efforts by being aggressive increase chance of misdiagnosis by 42%

Cahal Milmo
Tuesday 15 March 2016 00:31
Comments

For those with the misfortune to fear they are in the grip of a serious illness, there is a new tactic to significantly improve the chances of survival - be very polite to the doctor.

A study has found that the likelihood of being misdiagnosed dramatically increases when a doctor is presented with a “difficult” patient who obstructs the clinician’s efforts by being aggressive or questioning their competence.

Researchers established that the likelihood of misdiagnosis rose by 42 per cent when a group of GPs were confronted with a demanding patient exhibiting a set of complex symptoms, as opposed to a polite individual with an identical complaint.

The risk of misdiagnosis fell to just six per cent when dealing with more straightforward cases. But those who carried out the study said their findings were so stark that doctors should now be trained to challenge their own emotions when dealing with disruptive patients to avoid diagnostic mishaps.

The Dutch research, published in the British Medical Journal, was based on written case studies but its authors said it was likely the disparity would be even greater when doctors faced real-life patients and warned clinicians could no longer rely on the idea that their clinical judgment was unaffected by their emotions.

Dr Silvia Memede, from the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, who led the study, said: “Many clinicians have seen their interest turn into impatience by frequent attenders with vague complaints, repeated interruptions during a consultation or insistence in requesting unnecessary tests.

“Most doctors would, however, tend to deny that these feelings influence their judgments… The fact is that difficult patients trigger reactions that may intrude with reasoning, adversely affect judgments and cause errors.”

The researchers tested a group of 63 doctors in their final year of training as GPs by presenting them with a series of six written descriptions of patients with symptoms that clearly indicated conditions from pneumonia to inflammation of the pancreas caused by alcoholism.

Two versions of each description were produced - one which described a “neutral” patient and another making clear that the patient was demanding, for example by ignoring his or her doctor’s advice or presenting as “utterly helpless”.

When the GPs were asked to produce a diagnosis based on the descriptions while under pressure of time, they were found to always be more likely to misdiagnose the difficult patient, significantly so in complex cases such as appendicitis or a thyroid disorder. Importantly, further tests revealed that the findings held true even when extra time was available, suggesting that doctors were not consciously disengaging from more troublesome patients.

A second study by the same researchers suggested that the problem may due to the fact that doctors, in common with all human beings, have a finite amount of mental energy that can be applied to any one task. When a significant part of that activity has to be dedicated to dealing with overcoming obstacles thrown up by a patient, it is likely to interfere with processing clinical information correctly.

Doctors are more likely to misdiagnose a difficult patient when under time pressure (Getty)

The researchers acknowledged that the methodology of the study was far removed from the way a doctor might interact with a patient in a consulting room. But they suggested the pressures of real life meant that, if anything, the rate of misdiagnosis would be higher.

Dr Mamede told The Independent: “The most likely is that the effect of behaviours displayed by real patients is stronger. In real settings, physicians need to determine which information needs to be gathered and search for it themselves, which tends to make reasoning more demanding and therefore more prone to flaws.”

A separate study carried out by Canadian medics suggested that the ultimate guard against this type of misdiagnosis lies with patients themselves.

The research by doctors in Toronto found: “A medical encounter often provokes anxiety and an emotionally aware patient could channel these emotions towards the positive by introducing themselves with a nicety such as ‘Thank you for seeing me. I am frightened by what I am experiencing and that is why I am here’.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in