First there was the 5:2 diet, then the 2:5, then the 4:3... Where will it end?

January, and intermittent fasting is all the rage. But it's about to get even more radical

Sarah Morrison
Sunday 05 January 2014 01:00
Comments

Eating is now a numbers game. Depending on who you listen to, you should fast for two days a week, on alternative days, or even over five consecutive days every two months, if you want to keep the weight off. But as the diets get more radical, the perfect ratio of healthy eating is proving more elusive to pin down.

It all began with the 5:2 diet, the intermittent fasting eating plan championed by everyone from Beyoncé to Alex Salmond. It struck a chord in its simplicity. For two days a week you eat only 500 calories (600 for men), and the rest of the week you eat normally.

The Fast Diet, the book which advocated the fasting plan – written by Dr Michael Mosley and Mimi Spencer – reportedly ended last year as Amazon's best-selling book. An estimated four in 10 British slimmers tried the diet.

But now, nutritionists are upping the ante. Dr Krista Varady, one of the women whose clinical trials helped to start the 5:2 fasting plan, has published a new book lauding the Every Other Day diet, or the 4:3 diet – where you fast on alternate days.

Scientists at the University of Southern California have started a clinical trial to see how eating very little for five days in cycles can affect weight and even how it could be used to manage blood pressure.

The British Nutrition Foundation is hosting a symposium on the evidence behind popular diets this week, with a whole section dedicated to "intermittent fasting". Men seem keener on the fasting plan than, say, the low-carbohydrateAtkins diet. David Ryan, 54, a journalist who has never tried a structured diet before, said he plans to start the 5:2. "It's the carrot-and-stick approach of being able to resume normal eating after each day of fasting that's appealing," he said. "It's more attractive than constantly being on a diet."

Champions of the diet claim that it can bring health benefits, including longer life expectancy, increased cognitive function and protection against conditions such as dementia. Clinical trials have suggested a reduction in the risk of developing certain obesity-related diseases, such as breast cancer. However, the NHS describes the evidence for 5:2 as "limited" and the diet as "a fairly radical approach to weight loss".

But is it just another way to encourage structured dieters – usually women – to obsess about their weight? Nutritional therapist Deborah Colson, director of the British Association for Applied Nutrition and Nutritional Therapy, is not so sure. She said the basic principle of the restriction of calories was "clearly sound". She added: "When we were hunter gatherers, we didn't have a constant supply of food. When there is a lack of food, we become sharper, with more energy to find food.

"It's not all about calories; we have to make sure what we do eat counts in nutrients. Could it be that we could [just] eat less every single day?"

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in