The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

<p><b>The Facebook house party and its £30k of damage</b></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iv-drip/why-you-shouldnt-advertise-your-party-on-facebook-8399053.html" target="_blank">Facebook-advertised house party </a>is already renown

The Facebook house party and its £30k of damage

The Facebook-advertised house party is already renown

$50,000 for a tweet: The rise of 'social media prenups'

Lawyers are starting to write social media clauses into legal agreements

Lizzie Dearden
Friday 06 June 2014 15:18
Comments

Anyone who has been the victim of “revenge porn”, malicious tweets or even an embarrassing photo posted online by a partner can get up to $50,000 (£30,000) compensation per post in a new wave of “social media prenups”.

The legal arrangements, gaining popularity in the US, are allowing couples to lay down the boundaries for Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other networks and seek huge financial rewards if they are violated.

Banning posts of nude photos, embarrassing pictures or anything likely to harm a partner’s professional reputation are popular clauses.

Ann-Margaret Carrozza, a New York-based lawyer who specialises in pre-nuptial arrangements, said social media has started to crop up in contracts in recent months.

“We want to be able to contractually limit the damage,” she told ABC News. “The damage is psychological, in the case of humiliating posts and tweets and pictures out there, and it’s economic because my career prospects are harmed.”

The financial penalty set depends on a person’s wealth, but Ms Carrozza said someone living in New York City who makes below $5 million (£3 million) could pay $50,000 (£30,000) “per episode”, meaning per post or per tweet.

Sheri Meyers, relationship and family therapist from Los Angeles, has drawn up a social media prenup with her partner Jonathon Aslay.

Ms Meyers is writing a book on the importance of social media and relationships and believes all couples should talk about boundaries.

She acknowledged that people resent the idea of not trusting each other and find it hard to believe anyone would post something hurtful online at the start of a relationship.

“This social media prenup is about how to have a better relationship,” she told ABC News.

Pre-nuptial arrangements usually cover the division of property and income before marriages.

They are not legally binding in the UK, although the Law Commission found earlier this year that they should be considered in divorce settlements after the needs of the couple and their children have been accounted for.

Test cases in Britain have recognised prenups since 2010, when German heir Katrin Radmacher who sought to protect her £106 million fortune.

They are more widely used in the US, where they are recognised in all states but may not be enforced.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in