The Mercedes GLC 220 d has the same engine as the 250 d version
The Mercedes GLC 220 d has the same engine as the 250 d version

Mercedes GLC 220 d 4Matic Sport, car review: Does smaller and cheaper make a better SUV?

Merc's new offering is a decent contender for something like a BMW X3 or the Land Rover Discovery Sport

Graham Scott
Thursday 25 February 2016 15:23
Comments

Welcome to the world of the GLC. The new Mercedes SUV has lowered the barrier to entry by launching this 220 d version. It actually has the same engine as the 250 d but they’ve made it less powerful. You’d think, therefore, that it would be more economical. But it isn’t.

It’s the same 2.1-litre turbodiesel, and it is of course a refined and civilized unit. There’s the odd bit of diesel clatter but for the most part it responds smoothly whether you’re tootling along or giving it loads. This is just as well because, with 33bhp less and 74lb ft of torque down on the 250 d, you need to use plenty of right foot.

This means also that the nine-speed auto box has to do more work, shifting down where the bigger brother would have the torque to hold the gear. However, at 70mph you’ll still only be ticking over at 1500rpm, thanks to the nine speeds on offer, so it’s not a huge problem if you’re cruising.

The model tested was surprisingly firm, even in Comfort mode

At the legal limit there’s not much engine, wind or any other noise coming into the cabin to spoil your concentration. The interior is the usual high-quality cabin, with plenty of space for people and luggage. There’s a fair amount of kit, but if you want the 8.4in screen on the infotainment system you’ll have to find £3000 as it forms part of a Premium Plus pack.

Mercedes GLC 220 d 4Matic Sport

  • On sale: Now
  • Price: £36,945
  • Engine: 4cyl inline, 2143cc, turbocharged, diesel
  • Power: 168bhp at 3000-4200rpm
  • Torque: 295Ib ft at 1400-2800rpm
  • Kerbweight: 1845kg
  • Gearbox: 9spd automatic
  • 0-62mph: 8.3sec
  • Top speed: 130mph
  • Economy: 56.5mpg (combined)
  • CO2/tax band: 129g/km, 23%

The model we tried had passive suspension and it’s surprisingly firm, even in Comfort mode. That’s good because it keeps body roll in check and allows you to chuck the vehicle around quite easily, helped by the four-wheel drive. But it’s bad because it means the ride is verging on the harsh when road conditions deteriorate.

If you switch up to Sport that firmness and harshness get a bit too pronounced, while Eco feels a bit too dopey, so Comfort is probably the best place to stay.

This is a good, solid, classy SUV. It’s a decent contender for something like a BMW X3 or the Land Rover Discovery Sport. But in this guise the engine just seems to have to work that bit too hard too often. Sure, you gain a bit on the price of a 250 d but there are no savings in fuel or tax. We’re not sure that’s enough.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in