Sleep trackers may be causing disordered sleep
Sleep trackers may be causing disordered sleep

'Orthosomnia': New disorder affects people who track their sleep, study finds

Sleep trackers are contributing to sleep-related anxiety

Chelsea Ritschel
Thursday 29 March 2018 09:38
Comments

A new sleep disorder has arisen from the pursuit of a perfect night’s sleep, according to a new study.

Published in the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, researchers dubbed the sleep disorder: “‘Orthosomnia,’ with ‘ortho’ meaning straight or correct, and ‘somnia’ meaning sleep” - and it is affecting people who obsess over the results of their sleep and fitness trackers.

According to the researchers: “The use of wearable sleep tracking devices is rapidly expanding and provides an opportunity to engage individuals in monitoring of their sleep patterns.

“However, there are a growing number of patients who are seeking treatment for self-diagnosed sleep disturbances such as insufficient sleep duration and insomnia due to periods of light or restless sleep observed on their sleep tracker data,” the report reads.

Relying solely on the data on their trackers, people are convincing themselves that they suffer from a sleep disorder, even when they may not.

The subsequent outcome is people who are becoming obsessed with getting a “perfect” night’s sleep.

In order to study the effects of sleep trackers, which an estimated 10 per cent of US adults wear on a regular basis, the researchers looked at cases where adults were seeking help due to self-diagnosed sleep-related issues.

Fitness and sleep trackers don't always show the full picture 

In the first case, the adult male sought medical help for treatment of “irritability, cognitive difficulties, and fatigue,” which he found only affected him on days he didn’t get a full eight hours of sleep, as tracked by his sleep tracker.

And in all the cases, the patients had been tracking their own sleep each night and had become worried over periods of “restless sleep” and low “sleep efficiency.”

Rather than relying on their bodies and how they felt when they woke up each morning, it was found that the patients relied heavily on their sleep trackers to tell them whether they had gotten a restful sleep.

However, it is unknown whether the patients suffered from disordered sleeping before they started self-tracking their sleep.

According to the National Sleep Foundation, adults typically require seven to nine hours of sleep per night, depending on a range of factors and varying for each individual person.

But if you wake up feeling refreshed and awake, you have typically had a good night’s sleep - despite what a sleep tracker may tell you.

Instead of being helpful, sleep trackers may instead be reinforcing “sleep-related anxiety or perfectionism.”

It looks like counting sheep may be a better method.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in