Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

City: Blameless?

Richard Thomson
Sunday 24 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

The buck does not stop at the board of British Airways because, it seems, it never gets there in the first place. Astonishingly, not a single employee or director is losing his job over the dirty tricks scandal. BA believes the public and shareholders should be reassured by its own inimitable brand of internal inquiry. To determine whether anyone on the board was guilty, the directors asked each other whether they were involved. To no one's surprise, they all said no. Few people believe them, of course. Few except Lord King. The chairman blandly tells us the board is responsible but no one is to blame. That is a difficult concept for most folk outside BA to get their heads round. Even if the senior executives were exonerated by a hundred inquiries, the fact remains that something is badly wrong with the company if they did not know about the dirty tricks, and equally badly wrong if they did.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in