BHP Billiton, the world’s largest miner, reported a surge in underlying full-year profits on Tuesday and said it would exit its underperforming US shale oil and gas business, pleasing disgruntled shareholders who had called for a sale.
The Anglo-Australian mining giant, which is under pressure from US hedge fund Elliott Management to rethink its investment in oil and boost shareholder returns, was buoyed by a recovery in industrial commodity markets.
It generated more cash than even in some years of the mining boom, slashed net debt by nearly $10bn (£7.8bn) to $16.3bn and tripled its final dividend to $0.43 a share.
Underlying profit of $6.7bn was below expectations for $7.4bn, but the market focused on the lower debt and the company’s determination to exit US shale, pushing its shares up 1.2 per cent.
“Net debt looks very impressive ... so the cash looks like it was applied to deleveraging versus extra dividends,” Shaw and Partners analyst Peter O’Connor said.
BHP joined other miners who have boosted payouts in the current earnings season to reward shareholders amid a resurgence in commodity prices. Rio Tinto and iron ore miner Fortescue Metals both paid record dividends, while Anglo American reinstated its dividend.
Facing calls from some shareholders to dispose of the shale business it acquired at the height of the oil boom, the miner said it was “actively pursuing options to exit”.
Chief executive Andrew Mackenzie said the preference would be a small number of trade sales, but refused to give a timetable for quitting the business.
“We certainly have plenty of people interested in taking a look,” Mr Mackenzie said. “Our determination to exit means that we have other ways to exit that do not necessarily depend on ... a competitive set of willing buyers.”
Fund managers including Elliott and Tribeca have been agitating for shale’s divestment, along with higher shareholder returns and the elimination of dual-structured Australia and London stock listings.
Tribeca welcomed BHP’s comments that shale was no longer a core priority for the company.
“That was our approach. We didn’t see it fitting strategically in BHP. We think they can realise value ahead of market expectations for the US onshore business,” Tribeca analyst James Eginton said.
Elliott, which last week raised its stake in the miner’s London-listed arm to 5 per cent, was not immediately available to comment.
BHP chairman Jac Nasser, who retires this year, has conceded the $20bn investment in shale six years ago was a mistake. Analysts have suggested the business could sell for about half that today.
“The shale acquisitions were poorly timed. We paid too much,” Mr Mackenzie said, adding that the company would be careful not to repeat the mistake by acquiring other assets at the top of commodity cycles.
“We have fundamentally changed the way we think about capital allocation, and the process that supports this, to make sure this discipline remains entrenched throughout the cycle,” he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies