Britain’s Babcock beats off US rivals to service Army tanks

 

Mark Leftly
Thursday 20 November 2014 02:39
Comments

The blue chip government contractor Babcock International has edged out two huge US rivals to snap up nearly 3,000 of the Ministry of Defence’s top engineers.

The defence minister Philip Dunne confirmed yesterday that the MoD had selected the 123-year-old engineering services company as preferred bidder for the Defence Support Group’s land business, which maintains the Army’s armoured vehicles and tanks. A sale was first mooted in 2010.

DSG’s 2,800 engineers work on servicing, repairs and storage. The MoD has been looking to outsource vast chunks of its work in order to save money, but unions and senior personnel in the military are concerned that this could compromise national security.

Babcock’s victory will at least come as some relief to those who have been concerned that US groups keep landing the biggest MoD work.

Denver’s CH2M Hill and California-based Bechtel recently won the most important roles in managing parts of Defence Equipment & Support, the £14bn-budget agency that buys everything from missiles to submarines.

Babcock was up against Texas-based KBR and Virginia’s General Dynamics.

The air force, electronics and components part of DSG, which carries out complicated technical support for equipment such as wings will be retained within the MoD, but as a distinct agency.

Mr Dunne said that further details on Babcock’s winning bid would be available in the new year.

He added: “This has been a competitive process which is on track to deliver improved vehicle availability for the British Army at better value to the taxpayer over years to come.”

The Babcock chief executive, Peter Rogers, said he was committed to “improved performance levels, enhanced operational agility and greater cost efficiencies” for the army.

DSG was tempting to the private sector as it made a £67m profit in its latest annual results, though staff recently took industrial action arguing that they should share in some of this success.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in