Millions of British workers denied basic employment rights as 'gig economy' doubles in size, says TUC

TUC finds 'explosion in number of workers in precarious jobs with half a million denied sick pay

The number of people in precerious employment has doubled in the last decade, the TUC found
The number of people in precerious employment has doubled in the last decade, the TUC found

The number of workers denied basic employment protection has doubled in the past decade after an explosion in the gig economy, a new study has revealed.

The Trades Union Congress found that 3 million people are in precarious jobs, often living without benefits such as redundancy pay and protection from unfair dismissal.

Almost half a million people have no right to sick pay, the TUC found.

It said workers on zero hours contracts earned £3.80 an hour less than average employees, while casual staff and the self-employed earn 40 per cent less.

One in 10 people are now employed in the gig economy, the report found.

Frances O'Grady, the TUC's general secretary said: “Gig economy workers face the double hit of poverty wages and weaker employment rights. Whether they're waiting tables or driving for Uber, all workers deserve respect, fair pay and basic protections.

“But the law hasn't kept pace with how work has changed. That's why the Taylor review must drag the rules that protect working people into the 21st century.”

The TUC urged the Government to use its current review of emplyment practices to strengthen rights for those employed on precarious contracts.

The report comes as a host of companies have come under fire for the way they treat workers. Undercover filming at JD Sports showed staff complaining of conditions "worse than a prison" at its Rochdale factory. Workers on zero hours contracts can allegedly be sacked on the spot for minor rule infringements. The Department for Work and Pensions has suspended the company from hiring any more workers.

Sports Direct has attracted a barrage of criticism from MPs who said working conditions at the company were more similar to a Victorian workhouse than a modern retailer. The company has since taken some measures to adress the issue.

In a landmark case in October, Uber was told by a London employment tribunal that its drivers must be treated as workers, not self-employed contractors, and given basic rights such as the National Minimum Wage. The scathing judgment said Uber resorted to "fictions, twisted language, and even brand new terminology," in its contracts.

Judges said the "notion that Uber in London is a mosaic of 30,000 small businesses linked by a common 'platform' is in our minds faintly ridiculous", adding that Uber's arguments were "absurd".

Additional reporting by PA

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in