Rio Tinto: World's second-largest mining company is about to go coal-free

Rio Tinto is in the process of selling the last of its coal mines

Thomas Biesheuvel
Friday 10 November 2017 09:06 GMT
‘Having one of the big diversified miners without thermal coal does give investors more options’
‘Having one of the big diversified miners without thermal coal does give investors more options’ (Reuters)

Just five years ago it would have been almost unthinkable that one of the world’s biggest mining companies would not dig any more coal. It’s now likely to become a reality.

Rio Tinto, the world’s second-largest miner, has been steadily backtracking from coal to focus on better assets. It’s now looking for buyers for its remaining coal mines in Australia; the sale of those will mark a complete exit from the fossil fuel.

Rio’s potential coal-free future is in stark contrast with many of its rivals. Glencore, the world’s top coal shipper, this year increased its exposure by agreeing to pay $1.1bn (£837m) plus royalties for a large stake in Australian assets sold by Rio. The fuel, which generates about 40 per cent of the world’s electricity, is one of BHP Billiton’s main strategies, while Anglo American has pulled back on plans to sell out of the commodity.

While many miners are bullish on coal, the world’s dirtiest fuel has become a flashpoint for a growing movement of investors calling for miners to cut their exposure. For example, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund doesn’t invest in firms that make 30 per cent of their sales from coal, while the Church of England sets the limit at 10 per cent.

“People are picking different levels, whether they are divesting for ethical reasons or for business-driven reasons,” said Helen Wildsmith, head of climate change at CCLA Investment Management, which manages money for the Church of England. “Having one of the big diversified miners without thermal coal does give investors more options.”

Rio’s Preference

Yet Rio’s decision is more to do with its coal mines not being able to compete with its other assets, rather than pressure from climate change or divestment campaigns. Chief executive Jean-Sebastien Jacques has argued that even a mining firm as big as his only has so much managerial talent and money, and must focus those on more productive assets. It has also been able to sell coal mines for what it sees as good prices, allowing more cash to be returned to shareholders.

Even so, mining companies are increasingly having to consider how global proposals to curb greenhouse gases will impact the future of commodities they mine, said Ms Wildsmith, who’s part of a team of investors that talks to firms like BHP and Rio about climate change.

“The big diversified miners are all trying to work out which commodities are going to be most disadvantaged in the future, and the low-carbon transition is one of the big uncertainties that they and other companies are facing,” she said. “We’re seeing more companies integrating their thinking on climate change scenarios into the macro-economic and cyclical scenarios that they work with.”

It looks like Rio won’t have to worry about coal for too much longer. It sent out preliminary information on the Hail Creek and Kestrel coal mines to potential buyers last month and asked for indicative bids by early December, people familiar with the matter said in October.

The London-based miner has been shedding its Australian coal assets since dismantling its energy division in 2015. Earlier this year, it agreed to sell its company Coal & Allied Industries to China’s Yanzhou Coal Mining, before Glencore then bought a stake in the project. Rio has also sold other projects from Australia to Mozambique.


Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in