Royal Mail fined a record £50m by Ofcom for breaking law with price change

Watchdog says postal service broke competition law with proposed price rises in 2014

Caitlin Morrison
Tuesday 14 August 2018 07:24
Comments
The postal service said it plans to appeal Ofcom's decision
The postal service said it plans to appeal Ofcom's decision

Royal Mail has been fined £50m by the communications watchdog for a “serious breach” of competition law relating to a price change introduced in 2014.

It is the largest fine ever imposed by Ofcom, which is the result of an investigation following a complaint by delivery service Whistl over changes to wholesale prices.

At the time the price hike was proposed, Whistl, a customer of Royal Mail, was expanding its business to compete directly with the postal service in delivering business letters, or bulk mail, to certain parts of the UK.

Ofcom said the 2014 wholesale price increases meant that any of Royal Mail’s wholesale customers seeking to compete with it by delivering letters in some parts of the country would have to pay higher prices in the remaining areas where it used Royal Mail for delivery.

The regulator found that Royal Mail’s actions “amounted to anti-competitive discrimination against customers, such as Whistl, who sought to deliver bulk mail”.

Jonathan Oxley, Ofcom’s Competition Group Director, said: “Royal Mail broke the law by abusing its dominant position in bulk mail delivery.

“All companies must play by the rules. Royal Mail’s behaviour was unacceptable, and it denied postal users the potential benefits that come from effective competition.”

The postal service said it plans to appeal the fine, and “strongly refutes that it has acted in breach of the Competition Act”.

The company said the price change announced in January 2014 never came into effect, and added: “For an allegation of abusive price discrimination to be established, the law is very clear. The relevant prices must be actually paid. And, the party paying such prices must be placed at a competitive disadvantage as a result. In this case neither of these essential elements exist.”

Royal Mail also said the proposed increase had been “robustly stress tested” under competition law and the relevant regulation.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in