University leaders have rejected plans to abolish the existing system of degree classifications, despite a major inquiry concluding it is "not fit for purpose".
A task force led by Professor Robert Burgess recommended that firsts, 2:1s, 2:2s and thirds should be replaced with a simple "pass", "fail", or "distinction".
But the idea was too radical and lacked the necessary support among vice-chancellors, the umbrella group Universities UK said.
Instead, one option being considered is to add a new grade within the current 2:1, to help employers distinguish between the 40 per cent of all graduates who get upper seconds.
A spokesman for Universities UK said the pass, fail or distinction proposal had not won enough support. "There is a general acceptance that neither employers nor the [university] sector is ready for such groundbreaking change. People know what a 2:1 is.
"But the argument is that there are too many people with 2:1s, from an employer's point of view," he said.
Wes Streeting, from the National Union of Students, told the Times Higher Education Supplement: "Everyone seems to agree that the classification system is out-dated. But, as ever, there is no consensus about what should replace it."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies