Flagship academy Chatham Grammar School given ‘inadequate’ score by Ofsted

Inspectors present the most severe criticism yet of standards in a selective school

A grammar school which became one of the Government’s flagship academies has been rated “inadequate” by school inspectors – leading to a team from a rival school nearby being drafted in to take over.

Chatham Grammar School for Boys in Kent has been given the severest criticism ever of a selective school in a report by education standards watchdog Ofsted published on Tuesday.

The school is only the second grammar school in the country to fail its inspection in the two-decade history of the watchdog.

It is criticised for “inadequate” management which had failed to tackle “weak and inadequate” teaching – with the result that behaviour by the pupils deteriorated as they were no longer motivated.

The first grammar school to fail, in greater Manchester, only failed in one category: promoting community cohesion amongst different groups of pupils, a category now abolished. The criticism of Chatham Grammar School for Boys is far more wide-ranging.

It comes after chief school inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw warned of a war on “coasting” schools – those with a more privileged intake which were sitting on their laurels instead of improving what looked like good exam results.

Crucially, one of the areas it has been most severely criticised for is over the education of disadvantaged pupils whose presence qualifies the school for a pupil premium. Sir Michael said such pupils often fared worst in schools with only a handful in this category

Now a team of education experts from neighbouring Rochester Grammar School – ranked the second best in the entire country for its GCSE results last year – has been drafted into the school to begin the process of turning it round. Stuart Gardner, Rochester’ principal, said colleagues will help. A parents’ forum is to be held at the school tomorrow) to discuss issues.

“This is an excellent school community and I’m looking forward to helping it build both its reputation and academic standards,” said Mr Gardner.

In its report on the school, Ofsted said: “Leadership and management are inadequate because achievement – especially in English – and the quality of teaching have not improved quickly enough since the previous inspection.”

It added: “Teaching requires improvement because weak and inadequate teaching have not been eradicated. Teachers do not consistently plan lessons that challenge students.”

It concluded: “Students lose interest and motivation when teaching is not good enough so their learning is disrupted.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in