'No evidence' academy status improves grades at good or satisfactory schools

Scott d'Arcy
Monday 11 July 2016 23:46
Comments
Teachers are concerned about tougher working conditions in academy schools
Teachers are concerned about tougher working conditions in academy schools

New research has found "no evidence" that academy status leads to better grades for pupils at schools rated good or satisfactory.

The study, by the London School of Economics and the Education Policy Institute (EPI), found pupils' performance at schools already rated outstanding when they converted, totalling 390 institutions, saw a "statistically significant" rise in grades.

The research also found that Coalition-era academies had a lower impact on performance than the Labour-style sponsored academies, which were introduced in 2002 to help struggling schools.

It follows similar research from the EPI last week which found high levels of variability in standards among academy chains - also known as multi-academy trusts (MATs) and local authorities.

The analysis by the EPI, which will present its findings at a conference in central London on Tuesday, found that pupil attainment at the 203 sponsored academies created between 2002 and 2010 had seen a 30 per cent improvement - equivalent to achieving one GCSE grade higher across nearly five subjects.

But in the 4,470 new academies opened since May 2010 the improvement in grades was around 11 per cent - equivalent to one grade in nearly two subjects.

Researchers also said that improvement in schools rated good or satisfactory tended to improve in the years before conversion to an academy but that improvement was "not sustained or built upon".

Both studies come amid a continued push by the Government for schools to take on academy status, with Education Secretary Nicky Morgan insisting that it is the best way to ensure that youngsters have access to a world-class education.

But Jon Andrews, EPI director for education data and statistics, said the study meant policy should focus on improving schools regardless of whether they are academies or not.

He said: "Post-2010, the positive impact for those schools previously rated outstanding is one better grade in two GCSE subjects but there is no evidence that there is any positive impact on schools that were previously rated good or satisfactory.

"The Government should not pursue full academisation as a policy objective and should focus on what it is that's driving high performance to ensure the standards of the lower performing schools are brought up to that of the very best."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in