'Satisfactory' schools are often not, report says

Inspectors are being urged to abandon the term "satisfactory" to describe schools in the wake of evidence that thousands of those so labelled have serious weaknesses.

The call comes in a report published today by the Royal Society of Arts, which says they should be renamed "performing inconsistently". (Un)Satisfactory? Enhancing life chances by improving 'satisfactory schools' says that those labelled satisfactory should be declared "inadequate" if they get the satisfactory ranking in more than two inspections on the trot. The authors believe there will be more pressure on schools to seek to improve if the satisfactory label is abolished.

"The description 'satisfactory' suits no one," the report says. "It is pejorative enough to deter (some) families from choosing a school and to dampen staff morale. But at present there is little to help schools and their stakeholders to identify what specifically needs to improve.

"The term 'performing inconsistently' is a more accurate reflection of the school's situation and clearly flags that while some aspects of the school's provision may be good or better, improvement is needed in others." Figures show that one in three secondary schools are labelled "satisfactory" after inspections.

Becky Francis, the director of education at the RSA, said: "I think 'satisfactory' should only be used if it means what it says on the tin – and at the moment I don't think that it does." The report recommends bursaries for first-class graduates to encourage them to teach at struggling schools – including subsidising their student fees.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in