Students equate cheap courses with poor quality


Richard Garner
Monday 18 February 2013 19:04

Thousands of the cheapest university places are not being filled following the introduction of varied fees due to potential students worrying that their cut-price status means the courses are not worth the money.

Figures released today show that 7,000 of the 20,000 places earmarked for students opting for courses costing less than £7,500-a-year have remained unfilled. Academics and lecturers’ leaders pinned the blame for the shortfall on students not rating the courses because they were being offered at a cheaper price, as well as debt-averse students from poorer homes being reluctant to take on the still significant cost of courses.

The figures, which show 4,200 of the 9,600 places offered to higher education institutions remained unfilled as well as 2,800 of the 10,400 places at further education colleges, were unearthed by Labour’s higher education spokeswoman, Shabana Mahmood, through a Parliamentary question.

Universities Minister, David Willetts, said: “Some institutions were expected to recruit less than their allocation to compensate for over-recruitment in previous years. We expect there to be more full-time undergraduate students in higher education this year than any year before 2010.” However, Ms Mahmood said the figures were “a damning indictment” of the Government’s higher education reforms.

A spokesman for Mr Willetts said: “We are increasing student choice. Our policy is giving thousands of people access to higher education for the first time, including people with family responsibilities who can’t travel far.

“It is surprising to see Labour opposing a policy that has widened participation and ensured local, lower cost courses.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in