Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Thousands being failed by poor secondary schools

Neil Lancefield,Lauren Turner,Pa,Alison Kershaw
Wednesday 12 January 2011 11:11 GMT
Comments

Tens of thousands of teenagers are still being failed by poor secondary schools, league tables suggested today.

Newly-published statistics show that more than 200 secondaries in England are failing to meet tough new targets set by the Government at the end of last year.

That is around 7% of schools with valid and published results.

In total, at 216 secondary schools with valid results, less than 35% of pupils got at least five C grades in their GCSEs, including English and maths, and fewer youngsters made two levels of progress between 11 and 16 than the national average in the two subjects.

According to the figures, the national average for making expected progress in English this year was 72% and for maths it was 65%.

Schools that fail to reach the target have been warned they will be tagged as "underperforming" and face closure or being taken over.

The target was introduced as part of a major overhaul of England's schools system.

An analysis of the statistics suggests that almost 180,000 pupils were taught at these schools in 2009/10 and of these around 35,000 were taking their GCSEs last summer.

The league tables are based on GCSE, as well as A-level results, for last summer.

Selective grammar schools continued to dominate the top of the tables - England's best school this year, in terms of pupils gaining five A*-C grades at GCSE including English and maths, was Lawrence Sheriff School, a selective boys' school, in Rugby.

All of its 106 pupils reached this benchmark.

Headteacher Dr Peter Kent said: "We've got a very good curriculum to give the students a chance to pursue their own individual aims and aspirations.

"We focus on hard work but everyone in the school community is involved and we want people to be happy. There is a lot of sport, music and drama."

The worst school in the country was The Lafford High School in Billinghay, Lincolnshire, where just 8% of pupils achieved five A*-Cs including English and maths.

A note on the school's website said it was due to close in 2010.

Third from the bottom was The Marlowe Academy in Ramsgate, where 14% of pupils got at least 5 C grades, including English and maths.

Ian Johnson, principal at Marlowe Academy, said he was "not in the slightest bit worried about league table positions", but admitted he was disappointed with the school's results.

"In terms of English and Maths - in particular English - we have been slow to rise to the challenge.

"The league position is irrelevant. It's about the students reaching their potential.

"We are disappointed, we have to do better and we are working hard to do this."

The tables suggest that around a quarter of those listed in the league table of the worst 200 schools in the country are academies.

These semi-independent state schools, first established under Tony Blair's Labour government, have been championed by the coalition Government.

One in 10 secondary schools is now an academy, Government figures show, and there are now 407 academies open in England, - double the number open in May last year when there were 203.

For the first time, the Government has also published today figures showing how each school spends its money, making it possible for parents to see what public funds are being spent on.

Previously published national figures for England showed that 53.1% of pupils scored five GCSEs at grade C or higher, including English and maths in 2010.

Some 59.9% got at least two C grades and science, while 31.5% got a C or higher in a modern foreign language.

Education Secretary Michael Gove said: "This is the most detail parents and the public have ever had about how children are performing in England's secondary schools.

"Children, parents and schools should be proud of their results, which have been achieved through all the hard work they have put in. But as the international evidence ... shows us, England still lags behind other nations. We have not succeeded in closing the gap and in raising attainment for all students.

"That's why we are reforming our school system by learning from the best-performing countries. In nearly every other developed country in the world, children are assessed in a range of core academic subjects at 15 or 16. That is why the coalition introduced the English Baccalaureate as a measure of performance.

"The key performance measure remains the number of children who get five A*-C passes at GCSE, including English and maths.

"I am open to arguments about how we can further improve every measure in the performance tables - including the English Baccalaureate. But I am determined to ensure that our exam standards match the highest standards around the world."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in