Universities face severe financial consequences if tuition fees cut to £7,500, peers warn

Brexit and reduced income will hit institutions if no new funding granted, ministers told

Theresa May adds support to cutting tuition fees, but says scrapping them 'unaffordable'

Universities will face severe financial consequences if a tuition fee cut is given the green light, peers have warned.

Reduced tuition fees, the loss of EU grants and post-Brexit visa difficulties for academics could threaten university research in the UK, the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee says.

It comes after a government-commissioned review called for a cut in tuition fees to £7,500 per year.

But the cross-party group of peers claims any loss in tuition-fee income, as recommended in the Augur review, would force universities to reduce the resources needed for vital research.

Lord Patel, the committee’s chair, warned that the consequences for the country “will be devastating” if there is inadequate funding for scientific research as the UK risks falling behind.

He added that the recent review of post-18 education and funding “completely missed the mark” by not considering research funding while recommending a cut in tuition fees.

Lord Patel said: “It has made recommendations which, if implemented, could prove harmful to the already challenging ecosystem of university funding.”

Any loss in fees should be covered by increasing the teaching grant to universities to ensure the institutions are no worse off than they are now, the report says.

The warning follows reports last year that a number of universities were on the verge of bankruptcy.

Lord Patel added: “A university’s core operational activities of teaching and research are both loss-making activities already, and any shortfall in funding would become unmanageable.

“The immediate casualties will likely be widening-participation programmes, student experience, infrastructure maintenance and repair, and the hands-on elements of courses.”

The committee is calling on ministers to ensure the level of funding the UK currently receives from the EU for research is matched in full once the UK has left the EU.

They add that the government must ensure post-Brexit immigration laws do not hinder the ability of UK universities to recruit and retain the scientific staff they require.

David Thompson, senior policy analyst at the Russell Group, a group of the most prestigious universities in the UK, said: “The threat posed to UK science, research and industry by Theresa May’s review has been wholly under-estimated, but today’s report makes it clear that cutting tuition fees without fully making up the funding shortfall would be a serious mistake from any government.”

A Government spokesperson said: “As part of our ongoing review of Post-18 Education and Funding we will be responding to Philip Augar’s recommendations in due course.

“We have committed an additional £7bn for Research and Development by 2022, the largest increase since records began.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in