EXPLAINER: From 1800, a lesson in delayed election results

The tempestuous election of 2020 has been rife with predictions of confusion and cataclysm, with warnings that a contested battle could last well into December

Via AP news wire
Saturday 31 October 2020 20:20
AP Explains Logo
AP Explains Logo

The tempestuous election of 2020 has been rife with predictions of confusion and cataclysm, with warnings that a contested battle could last well into December.

It has happened before. Take 1800, for example.

The two parties were in bitter opposition The Federalists nominated John Adams for a second term; the “Democratic-Republicans” chose Thomas Jefferson. The voting, as retold by historian Jill Lepore in “These Truths: A History of the United States,” did not take place on a single day — it was conducted from March to November.

Of a population of 5.23 million people, only 600,000 could vote. All but three of the 16 states restricted suffrage to property holders or taxpayers; only in Maryland could free-born Blacks vote, and only in New Jersey did women have suffrage. (Both loopholes would close in a few years.)

And only in Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia could voters cast ballots for delegates to the Electoral College. Otherwise, the votes were for legislators who would cast their state's votes. Nowhere did voters cast ballots for presidential candidates.

The candidates themselves did not campaign in those days, but the election was a raucous one. The Republicans attacked Adams as a would-be monarch, citing the Alien and Sedition Acts. And the Federalists accused Jefferson of being an atheist. The Federalist newspaper The Gazette of the United States, in a report that might sound familiar today, wrote that Americans would choose between “GOD — AND A RELIGIOUS PRESIDENT” and “JEFFERSON — AND NO GOD!!!!”

Adams lost the election. But it was not clear who won it, thanks to a quirk in the Constitution, which did not separate the elections of the president and the vice president. As a result, Jefferson and his running mate, Aaron Burr — yes, the same Aaron Burr who would kill Alexander Hamilton in a duel four years later — were tied with 73 votes apiece.

Because one of the Republican delegates failed to vote against Burr — which would have made Jefferson the winner — the race was thrown into the House, which was dominated by the Federalists. Hamilton worked to convince his fellow Federalists to support Jefferson (who was, he said, “by far not so dangerous a man” as Burr).

It took until February 1801, but the House selected Jefferson over his running mate.

That scenario would never recur. In 1804, the 12th Amendment split the election of the president and vice president.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in