Genetic Food: Monsanto is fined for GM `pollution'

Michael McCarthy
Thursday 18 February 1999 00:02
Comments

THE CONTROVERSY surrounding genetically modified food continued yesterday when Monsanto, the US biotech company, which is the world's biggest promoter of GM products, was fined pounds 17,000 for "genetic pollution" and then immediately vowed to fight any British moratorium on the growing of GM crops.

In the first prosecution of its kind in Britain, the Health and Safety Executive charged the company with failing to prevent pollen from genetically modified crops from being released into the environment at a trial site in Lincolnshire.

Monsanto admitted the offence and was also ordered by magistrates at Caistor, Lincolnshire, to pay pounds 6,159 costs.

Another company charged with a similar offence at the same site, the seed producer Perryfields Holdings, was fined pounds 14,000 and ordered to pay costs of pounds 5,000.

The case was another setback for the Government in its attempt to convince the public that genetically modified food plants present no risk, in cultivation or consumption.

The Food Safety minister, Jeff Rooker, insisted after the hearing that there was a "robust" regulatory system in place and that consumer protection was the Government's top priority, but Friends of the Earth denounced Monsanto's fine as "pathetic," and William Hague, the Leader of the Opposition, said that a Conservative peer would introduce a private member's Bill in the Lords to impose a three-year GM crops moratorium.

English Nature, the Government's wildlife adviser, has called for such a delay before such crops are grown commercially because of the dangers to wildlife of the new weedkillers developed to go with them.

Monsanto said it would resist any such move, if necessary by appealing to the European Commission.

The court heard that both Monsanto and Perryfields were using the plot at Rothwell to test-grow varieties of oilseed rape that had been genetically modified to be tolerant of particular weedkillers.

A condition of their licences was to keep a six-metre-wide pollen barrier of non-GM crops around the modified crops, to prevent modified pollen mixing with normal plants in the area.

But an HSE inspection found that the pollen barrier had been cut back in some places to just two metres to put in a roadway, and improve the look of the site.

An HSE inspector, Andrew Tommey, also found a gap had been created between the GM crops and the pollen-barrier crops, creating what he described as a "wind tunnel", allowing pollen to escape.

Simon Parrington, for the prosecution, said no one from either company bothered to visit the site to see if the terms of their licences were being followed.

"Neither company had taken sufficient steps to make sure that the barriers were in place," he said.

The companies said the pollen barrier had been cut back by an employee of the firm hired to manage the site.

Rhodri Price Lewis, for the defence of both companies, told the court: "An employee who was not aware of the consent regulations mowed and removed plants in order to make it easier to get at the trial plants. This was not an act which was under the control of these companies."

A concern of ecologists is that pollen from herbicide- tolerant crops might carry weedkiller resistance into nearby wild plants, so producing "superweeds."

But Dan Verakis of Monsanto said after the hearing that the chance of GM pollen affecting other crops in the area was minimal.

Letters, Review, page 2

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in