Chinese researcher deleted data about early Covid cases in Wuhan, study finds

‘This study does not provide any additional strong evidence favoring either natural zoonosis or lab accident,’ says researcher

Samuel Osborne
Thursday 24 June 2021 15:44
Comments
<p>Coloured scanning electron micrograph of an apoptotic cell (red) infected with coronavirus particles (yellow) isolated from a patient sample</p>

Coloured scanning electron micrograph of an apoptotic cell (red) infected with coronavirus particles (yellow) isolated from a patient sample

A leading American scientist has discovered that early sequences of the coronavirus genome submitted by a Chinese researcher were deleted from a shared database.

Jesse Bloom, a researcher at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in Seattle, has published a paper saying he found genetic sequences taken from early coronavirus cases in China were deleted from a US National Institutes of Health database.

He was able to recover the files from cloud storage to find that some of the early cases in the Chinese city of Wuhan are genetically different from the variants that eventually spread to cause the pandemic.

Mr Bloom said the data does not shed any further light on whether the virus spread naturally from animals to humans or whether it was the result of a laboratory leak.

"This study does not provide any additional strong evidence favoring either natural zoonosis or lab accident,” Mr Bloom told CNN. “Rather, it shows that there are additional sequences from relatively early in the outbreak that are still unknown, and in some cases have mutations that suggest they are probably evolutionarily older than the viruses from the Huanan Seafood Market.”

In a pre-print paper posted on bioRxiv, which has not yet been peer reviewed, Mr Bloom wrote: “I recover the deleted files from the Google Cloud, and reconstruct partial sequences of 13 early epidemic viruses.

“Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences in the context of carefully annotated existing data suggests that the Huanan Seafood Market sequences that are the focus of the joint WHO-China report are not fully representative of the viruses in Wuhan early in the epidemic.

“Instead, the progenitor of known SARS-CoV-2 sequences likely contained three mutations relative to the market viruses that made it more similar to SARS-CoV-2's bat coronavirus relatives.”

He went on to outline the implications of his research in a lengthy Twitter thread.

“First, fact this dataset was deleted should make us skeptical that all other relevant early Wuhan sequences have been shared. We already know many labs in China ordered to destroy early samples,” he wrote.

“Second major implication is that it may be possible to obtain additional information about early spread of #SARSCoV2 in Wuhan even if efforts for more on-the-ground investigations are stymied.”

The sequences were removed in June 2020 at the request of the Chinese investigator who originally submitted them in March of that year, the NIH confirmed to CNN. It said it was standard practice to allow this.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in