Renters have higher levels of harmful stress markers than home owners, study finds

'Higher CRP, indicating worse health, is found among those living in the private rented sector,' experts warn

Alex Matthews-King
Health Correspondent
Tuesday 15 January 2019 01:01
Comments
Lack of house building and spread of buy-to-let has made housing more insecure and costly
Lack of house building and spread of buy-to-let has made housing more insecure and costly

People living in rented flats have measurably higher levels of stress chemicals in their blood than homeowners or those living in a detached property, a study suggests.

Researchers looking at the health impacts of insecure or low quality housing suggest that renting privately could be harmful to the health and argue this should be considered when developing housing policies.

To test the possible health effects, researchers from Essex University looked at a biological marker known as C-reactive protein (CRP) which is found at elevated levels in the blood in response to stress, injury and infection.

Tests for elevated CRP levels are used to diagnose those at risk of heart disease, or chronic inflammatory conditions such as IBS or arthritis.

“Higher CRP, indicating worse health, is found among those living in the private rented sector,” said Dr Amy Clair, of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, author of the study published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

“This finding supports arguments for greater consideration of the negative effects of the current private rented market in the UK, characterised by greater insecurity, higher cost and lower quality than is typically found in other tenures.”

The study used blood samples and housing interviews with 9,593 adults aged over 21 and found one in five (22 per cent) had elevated levels of CRP – above the threshold of three milligrams per litre associated with heart disease.

However, levels were higher in people living in affordable housing (1.1mg/l), followed by private renters (0.8mg/l). Those who owned their home or had a mortgage had CRP levels below 0.6mg/l.

Similar patterns were found in those receiving housing benefit, having nearly twice the level of CRP as those not receiving benefits.

These differences were evident even after the authors controlled for respondents’ obesity levels and smoking status, factors closely associated with socioeconomic deprivation which might also increase CRP.

However, this research cannot prove that housing caused the rise directly, and it is likely that a variety of linked factors contribute to it.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Previous studies have linked access to parks and outdoor spaces with housing and health issues, and this may also account for some of the findings, Dr Clair added.

“The significant findings for housing type and tenure point to an influence of autonomy and control,” she said. “Where control is low, the sense of security is reduced, which may affect health through chronic stress responses.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in