Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Shrewsbury Hospital: Timeline of a scandal

How a catalogue of issues at the NHS trust has been brought to light

Shaun Lintern
Health Correspondent
Thursday 16 July 2020 15:51 BST
Comments
The death of baby Kate Stanton-Davies triggered the Shrewsbury scandal
The death of baby Kate Stanton-Davies triggered the Shrewsbury scandal (Richard Stanton)

Concerns over the standards of care at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust first emerged following the avoidable death of baby Kate Stanton-Davies in March 2009.

In the years since, thanks to her parents and the families of other babies who have died, the Midlands trust has come under intense scrutiny. Despite multiple public pledges that it has made improvements, problems continue to be highlighted.

March 2009

Kate Stanton-Davies was born “pale and floppy” at Ludlow midwifery led unit in Shropshire, in March 2009. She was airlifted to Birmingham’s Heartlands Hospital while her parents were made to drive separately. She died hours later.

Her mother, Rhiannon Davies, had been wrongly classed as low risk and should have been on a main hospital ward. A review in 2015 confirmed there had been a series of mistakes by midwives and found an initial investigation into Kate’s death was flawed and not fit for purpose.

An inquest in 2012 concluded Kate’s death was avoidable. The trust’s head of midwifery Cathy Smith, who later received a written warning for misconduct over her handling of the case, said her death had been a “rare and tragic case”.

September 2015

After years of complaints, an independent review into Kate’s death by midwifery expert Debbie Graham, revealed the first suggestion of a wider systemic issue at the trust. Ms Graham said Kate’s death had echoes of the maternity scandal at the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay.

The review also helped expose wider national failings in the way maternity incidents were investigated across the NHS.

April 2016

A separate review of the trust’s response to Kate Stanton-Davies death found a poor safety culture and defensive attitude towards complaints. It said: “The service rather than the service user was placed at the centre of the trust’s response.”

At the end of April, baby Pippa Griffiths was born at home in Shropshire but died a day later after midwives failed to listen to concerns by her parents and did not recognise an infection.

April 2017

Shropshire coroner John Ellery ruled Pippa’s death would have been preventable had she and her mother received appropriate care.

The then health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, asked midwifery expert Donna Ockenden to review the care and treatment of 23 families at the trust after the parents of Pippa Griffiths and Kate Stanton-Davies appealed to him for help.

November 2017

The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust was taken to court by the Health and Safety Executive after the deaths of five elderly patients who fell while being cared for at at the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford and the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital between June 2011 and November 2012. The trust was fined £333,000.

The HSE said while “policies and procedures were in place” they had not been consistently applied, which meant patients were left at risk.

August 2018

The Care Quality Commission warned the trust it could face action after an inspection revealed multiple safety concerns. It described patients being treated like “animals and cattle” in “unsafe, demeaning, undignified, and disgusting” conditions.

Later that month, dozens more concerns of maternity safety failings emerged at the trust with at least 60 separate cases of baby or mother deaths were identified.

New health secretary Matt Hancock agreed to widen the Ockenden review to consider all cases of concern.

In September 2018, an inspection by the CQC found the same mistakes that contributed to the death of baby Kate Stanton-Davies were being repeated. The trust was rated inadequate by the CQC in November 2018 and placed into special measures.

February 2019

National body NHS Improvement was accused of attempts to cover up the scale of failings at the trust after it sets up a review panel to oversee the Ockenden inquiry. The panel was later disbanded amid criticism by families.

May 2019

The CQC issued its fourth warning to the trust over the standards of care in its emergency department.

November 2019

The Independent first revealed the scale of failings in the maternity units at the trust in a leaked interim report by the Ockenden inquiry that found dozens of babies and mothers may have died with more than 40 babies left severely brain damaged.

The report detailed the failure to learn from mistakes with errors repeated time and again. The cases dated back as far as the 1970s and confirmed the scandal as the largest single maternity failing in NHS history.

December 2019

Payouts to families whose babies died or were left disabled after care at the trust totalled almost £50m, according to data uncovered by The Independent. Some 82 claims had been made, with 52 settled at a cost of £47.5m, while 40 further cases were still being investigated by NHS Resolution.

March 2020

The trust is forced to repay a bonus of almost £1m it had been handed in a maternity incentive scheme. It had been paid £963,391 in 2018 for meeting 10 required safety standards, despite later being rated as inadequate by the CQC. The trust’s chief executive said the payment had been “reassessed” and found to have been claimed without sufficient evidence.

June 2020

The police announced a criminal inquiry into the maternity issues, with West Mercia Police assessing whether there was evidence of criminal actions by the trust or individuals.

July 2020

Care Quality Commission chief Ted Baker writes to NHS England urging action over consistent failings found by the watchdog’s inspectors across departments. He raises the prospect of placing the trust into special administration for safety reasons – something that has only been done at Mid Staffordshire, which itself was at the centre of a public inquiry.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in