Lynx firm cleared over epidemic advert

 

Josie Clarke
Wednesday 11 July 2012 07:02
Comments

An advert for Lynx deodorant in the style of a breaking news bulletin about a worldwide epidemic has been cleared following complaints that it was not immediately recognisable as a commercial.

The TV advert for Lynx Attract began with large on-screen text stating "Breaking News" while a news-reader said: "News reports just in of an epidemic spreading across the world."

The newsreader went on to describe a light plane making an emergency landing in Barcelona and escaped animals bringing Berlin to a standstill while footage showed people in New York wearing gas masks and protective clothing.

The newsreader said: "Scenes in New York show how quickly the epidemic is spreading. Emergency responders say the scale of the chaos may be beyond any sense of control" as people were shown removing their clothes and kissing.

The advert was cleared with a post-7.30pm restriction.

Ten viewers complained that it was not immediately clear that it was an advert and 19 complained about its sexual content. Another four said it was offensive for making light of serious issues such as aeroplane accidents and epidemics.

Defending the advert, Unilever said it used a "fantastical and humorous tone" interspersed with regular references to Lynx Attract, with the first mention taking place 14 seconds into the advert.

It believed that the continuation of funny, surreal situations, which would not normally be featured or shown in that style as part of a genuine news item, made it obvious to viewers that it was a spoof and not a real news item.

The Advertising Standards Authority said: "We noted the ad did not show a plane accident but referred to an emergency landing caused by passengers becoming amorous. We also noted the ad referred to an 'epidemic', but the scenarios were not rooted in reality and did not represent any real-life incidents.

"We understood that the references to an emergency plane landing and an epidemic might not have been to all tastes, but considered that, given the way the material was presented, the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence to viewers."

It ruled that no further action was necessary.

PA

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in