Emily Maitlis replaced for Newsnight episode after BBC says Cummings remarks ‘did not meet standards’ on impartiality
Presenter praised saying prime minister’s chief advisor ‘broke the rules’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Emily Maitlis has been replaced for an episode of the BBC's flagship current affairs show Newsnight on the same day the broadcaster said an introduction in which she discussed the Dominic Cummings controversy “did not meet our standards of due impartiality”.
The presenter was praised by some viewers for her opening to the show, in which she said Boris Johnson’s chief advisor “broke the rules” and added: “The country can see that, and it’s shocked the government cannot.”
The BBC said in a statement on Wednesday that staff had been “reminded of the guidelines” around impartiality following the broadcast.
And a spokeswoman for the broadcaster has since confirmed Ms Maitlis will not present the coming episode of the show. She is to be replaced by Katie Razzall.
In her opening to the programme, Ms Maitlis said: “The longer ministers and the prime minister tell us he worked within [the rules], the more angry the response to this scandal is likely to be.
“He was the man, remember, who always got the public mood, who tagged the lazy label of elite on those who disagreed. He should understand that public mood now – one of fury, contempt and anguish.”
In its response to the broadcast, the BBC said it must “uphold the highest standards of due impartiality in its news output”.
The statement added: “We’ve reviewed the entirety of last night’s Newsnight, including the opening section, and while we believe the programme contained fair, reasonable and rigorous journalism, we feel that we should have done more to make clear the introduction was a summary of the questions we would examine, with all the accompanying evidence, in the rest of the programme.
“As it was, we believe the introduction we broadcast did not meet our standards of due impartiality.”
Ms Maitlis was praised for the “brilliant” introduction to the show.
One person on Twitter said her comments were “most definitely needed,” while another tweeted: “Emily Maitlis has summed it up perfectly.”
Sharing a clip of the opening monologue, David Lammy, a Labour MP, called the Newsnight introduction “public service broadcasting”.
Last year, the BBC was caught up in an impartiality row over comments made by Naga Munchetty about Donald Trump and racism during a live broadcast.
The BBC Breakfast presenter was judged to have beached BBC editorial guidelines when she discussed remarks made by the US president after he told female Democrats to “go back” to their countries.
However, the ruling was later reviewed and reversed by the corporation’s director-general, Lord Tony Hall.
Earlier this month, Ms Munchetty said “lessons have been learned and things are improving after she had “very robust” conversations with senior figures at the broadcaster following the debacle.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments