The Sun's Jeremy Corbyn apology provokes further outrage with 'tiny' front page mention

The newspaper was forced to publish a correction to a 'significantly misleading' story from September

Many of Mr Corbyn's supporters said the apology was not given sufficient prominence
Many of Mr Corbyn's supporters said the apology was not given sufficient prominence

The Sun may have been ordered to print its apology to Jeremy Corbyn on its front page but some readers were struggling to find it today.

The Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso) found the newspaper had been “significantly misleading” in a September story that wrongly alleged the Labour leader joined the Privy Council to gain millions of pounds for his party.

After months of wrangling over an accuracy complaint, The Sun agreed to put a correction on its cover, but buried it with four lines at the bottom left corner of the page.

The Sun's front page correction appeared in the bottom left corner on 22 December.

The headline, directing readers to page two, read “Ipso complaint on Labour short money upheld”, making no reference to Mr Corbyn or the fact it was the subject of the complaint.

The brief mention sparked ridicule on Twitter, where Corbynites expressed outrage at the tiny space afforded and called for a larger mention.

John Prescott, the former deputy Labour leader, was among the critics, writing: “Hardly equal prominence & not an apology.”

The full 297-word correction was published on page two as agreed with Ipso, which replaced the British media’s previous regulatory body following the hacking scandal.

Its ruling, first revealed by this newspaper, stipulated that the headline, placement and front size of both the front-page reference and full adjudication had to be agreed in advance, as well as appearing on The Sun’s website.

Rosemary Brocklehurst, who worked in the Labour Party press office in the 1980s, had made the complaint following its front page on 15 November reading: “Court Jezter: leftie who hates the royals WILL kiss Queen’s hand to grab £6.2m.”

Ipso ruled that the story incorrectly claimed Mr Corbyn accepted his invitation to the Privy Council for Short money – the funding allocated to opposition parties for parliamentary duties.

There is no official requirement for the Leader of the Opposition to join the council in order to receive it, with the sum being determined by the number of seats won.

According to the printed adjudication, The Sun said that the article “could have been clearer, but was based on accurate information” that founded its argument that Mr Corbyn could have caused a constitutional crisis and put the funding at risk.

The newspaper offered a short clarification confirming Privy Council membership was not a condition for Short money but Ipso said the proposal, made more than a month after the complaint, was not fast enough.

“The newspaper had not offered a correction promptly and therefore had failed to comply with its obligations under Clause 1 (accuracy),” the ruling said.

“Ipso’s Complaints Committee found that it was significantly misleading to claim that Labour’s access to the £6.2m depended on whether Mr Corbyn was a member of the Privy Council. The two were not formally connected and the article did not make clear how a majority of the funding was in fact allocated.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in