Scientist (PhD in astrophysics) shocked by reference to her ethnicity as Daily Mail accused of insulting female experts on Newsnight

 

Sarah Morrison
Friday 21 March 2014 21:00
Comments

A respected scientist has attacked the Daily Mail for implying that she was chosen to speak on Newsnight because of her gender and skin colour – saying it has put her off ever appearing on television again.

Dr Hiranya Peiris, a reader in Astronomy at University College London (UCL), is a world expert on the study of the cosmic microwave background. She told The Independent that comments in the Ephraim Hardcastle diary column about her appearance on the BBC2 programme caused “a lot of emotional suffering” and undermined efforts to encourage more women leaders in science.

“It was deeply upsetting,” she said. “I don’t think I need to say I have the qualifications to speak about the result on Newsnight. But he managed to reduce my career to my gender and skin colour.”

She added: “It has discouraged me from going on TV. I am far from the only woman who has been attacked and it’s usually based on personal appearance that is irrelevant to experience. It shows an underlying sexism.”

Dr Peiris appeared on the flagship BBC news programme on Monday night with her colleague Dr Maggie Aderin-Pocock, an honorary research associate at UCL’s Physics and Astronomy department, to discuss the discoveries from the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarisation 2 experiments – hailed as a major breakthrough for the Big Bang theory.

But on Wednesday, the gossip column, notorious for its acerbic tone, took a dig at the BBC’s quest for diversity, writing: “So, two women were invited to comment on the report about (white, male) American scientists who’ve detected the origins of the universe – giggling Sky at Night presenter Maggie Aderin-Pocock and Sri Lanka-born astronomer Hiranya Peiris.”

A representative from UCL wrote an open letter to the Daily Mail editor, Paul Dacre, attacking the “profoundly insulting” piece that appeared to question the credibility of the scientists.

Dr Peiris said: “There is a problem of getting women into senior positions [in science]. Part of that reason is constant feedback from society that we don’t belong there.” Dr Aderin-Pocock added: “There is a lack of female experts and we need to get them out there. It’s disappointing because other women might see this and think, ‘we’re not going to go anywhere near this.’”

A Mail spokesman said the paper fully accepted that the women were highly qualified in their field and that that was the reason they were chosen for interview. Yesterday’s Ephraim Hardcastle column stated: “I accept without questions that both ladies are highly qualified.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in