Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Bridge

Maureen Hiron
Friday 26 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

SOUTH'S OPTIMISTIC bidding on this hand was not matched by flair in the play. The opening lead gave him the chance to make his contract - but he did not stop to consider why he had been graced with such good fortune.

West opened One Heart and following two passes South bid One Spade. West rebid his hearts, North supported spades and South bid game.

Against Four Spades West led the eight of diamonds. Declarer took this as dummy and led the queen of spades, which lost to West's singleton king. West now played the ace of hearts and, on seeing East's encouraging seven, continued with a low one.

In with the king, East promptly switched to a club and the contract was defeated by two tricks.

So what inference had declarer missed? West had bid hearts twice, yet had not led one. Therefore his suit could not be solid - probably A Q to six - for if the suit had been headed by the A K Q or even K Q he would surely have preferred that attack. Therefore East should hold the king of hearts. He can't have had the king of spades as well, otherwise, with six points, he would have responded to West's opening bid.

Therefore declarer's only real chance was that the king of spades was bare in the West hand, and so he should have laid down the ace. After completing the drawing of trumps he cashes his diamonds, discarding a heart from dummy. Now he loses just one heart and two clubs.

Game all; dealer West

North

4Q J 9 4

!4 3

#K Q 9

2J 10 7 4

West East

4K 47 3 2

!A Q 10 9 8 6 !K 7 2

#8 2 #6 5 4 3

2A Q 8 3 29 6 2

South

4A 10 8 6 5

!J 5

#A J 10 7

2K 5

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in