Celebrity injunction: Judges consider whether decision to lift privacy order can be taken to Supreme Court

Appeal court judges ruled the privacy order should be lifted on Monday

The boy did not seem to show empathy towards his victims, the court heard (Getty Images)

Judges are now considering whether a celebrity can take the decision to lift an injunction preventing a tabloid from publishing details of his alleged “extra-marital activities” to the Supreme Court.

The man, named in court documents as PJS, lost the latest round of his legal battle on Monday when three judges at London's Court of Appeal ruled that the privacy order protecting him from being named should be lifted.

Lawyers for the Sun on Sunday asked the court to lift the injunction barring them from publishing the story because the man - who is described as being in the entertainment business and in a relationship with someone who is also a well-known individual in the same business - has been named by publications in the US, Scotland and other countries. The injunction only applies in England and Wales.

Lord Justice Jackson, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Simon ruled in the newspaper's favour on Monday. Lord Justice Jackson said “knowledge of the relevant matters is now so widespread that confidentiality has probably been lost,” meaning the harm the injunction was designed to counter had already likely taken place.

PJS can still not be named until his appeal has been heard. The man is now asking to take his case to the Supreme Court.

Desmond Browne QC, representing PJS, said the Court of Appeal's decision could lead to rule of the press“ as opposed to ”rule of the law“ and signal the death of the "celebrity privacy injunction".

A Supreme Court spokeswoman told the Press Association justices were considering his application. She said: "A decision whether to grant, or refuse, permission is expected to be made by the end of the day."

Additional reporting by PA