Stephen Fry responds to Christian backlash after confronting God with 'Bone cancer in children? What's that about?'

The actor clarified his remarks on BBC Radio 4's Today show

Jenn Selby
Friday 06 February 2015 10:41
Comments

Stephen Fry’s mock confrontation with God during an interview with Gay Byrne saw Twitter transform into streams of philosophical pondering, angry Christian trolling and admiration.

“Suppose it’s all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God,” Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. “What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?”

“I’d say, bone cancer in children? What’s that about?” Fry replied.

“Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That’s what I would say. ”

His comments led the incoming head of Ireland’s Presbyterian Church, Rev Ian McNie, to brand him “spiritually blind”.

“I felt sorry for the man that his understanding of life is simply confined to the here and now and from his position of atheism there is no hope for the future,” McNie said.

Speaking about the outcry his comments have caused on BBC Radio 4’s the Today show, Fry apologised for any offence he might have caused.

“I don’t think I mentioned once any certain religion, and I certainly didn’t intend, and I know I didn’t, to say anything offensive towards any particular religion,” he said. “I said quite a few things that were angry at this supposed God. I was merely saying things that Bertrand Russell and many finer heads of the mind have said for many thousands of years, going all the way back to the Greeks.

Also being talked about today is this satirical response piece created by Irish spoof site WaterfordWhispersNews.com, joking that Byrne had had to receive counselling following his interview with Fry.

“He felt a little faint after all that ‘what’s the craic with dead children God, huh?’ nonsense from Fry, so we let him have a lie down,” a definitely didn’t explain to RTÉ, “but we can confirm he’s booked in for intensive counselling. Six months should do it.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in