The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

Peter Jackson 'might testify' against Weinstein in Ashley Judd's lawsuit, lawyer says

Judd's civil suit accused the Hollywood producer of discouraging Jackson in 1998 from casting her in Lord of the Rings

Clarisse Loughrey
Wednesday 19 September 2018 15:58
Comments
Harvey Weinstein: The celebrities who have accused him of sexual misconduct so far

Peter Jackson has spoken with Ashley Judd's legal team and could contribute a "powerful" testimony in support of her defamation and sexual harassment lawsuit against Harvey Weinstein, Judd's lawyer has said.

Judd's civil suit, filed in April, accused the disgraced Hollywood producer of discouraging Jackson in 1998 from casting her in his blockbuster franchise Lord of the Rings, as a form of retaliation for her refusing Weinstein's sexual advances.

The lawsuit cited an interview with Jackson published by the New Zealand website Stuff in December 2017, quoting him as saying he had heard from Weinstein's former production company, Miramax, that Judd was a "nightmare to work with".

Jackson said in the article that this persuaded him not to cast her, but that he later became convinced she was the victim of a "smear campaign". Judd has argued her failure to land the role undermined her career.

The director's quotes became a central topic at a hearing on Tuesday, in which Weinstein's attorney Phyllis Kupferstein asked U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez in Los Angeles to dismiss Judd's lawsuit. The judge has not ruled on the request.

Judd's attorney, Theodore Boutrous, said in court her legal team had spoken with Jackson and determined he was accurately quoted and that it was Weinstein himself who had made the disparaging comments about Judd.


Boutrous said after the hearing that Jackson had information that could prove critical in supporting Judd's claim.

"We believe he will be a powerful witness and I'll match him up against Harvey Weinstein any day of the week," Boutrous told reporters.

Kupferstein argued that saying someone was a "nightmare" did not necessarily reflect on the person's professional abilities. "I do not believe there are enough facts at this time for her to pursue the defamation allegation against Mr. Weinstein," Kupferstein said.

Weinstein is currently facing criminal rape and sexual misconduct charges in Manhattan over allegations made by three women. The producer will also face charges of violating sex trafficking laws filed by a British actress. He has denied ever having non-consensual sex during his time working as a movie producer.

Judd was one of the first women in October 2017 to publicly accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct. Boutrous told reporters the lawsuit could go to trial within a year. Neither Judd nor Weinstein attended the court hearing.

Jackson has declined to comment. A representative for Weinstein has been contacted for comment.

Additional reporting by Reuters

Follow Independent Culture on Facebook for all the latest on Film, TV, Music, and more

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in