Protest as paedophile envoy keeps his pension

Robert Coghlan, the diplomat jailed for three years for importing child pornography through the diplomatic bag, will not lose his pension rights despite being sacked by the Foreign Office.

The decision by the Foreign Office not to remove the pension rights from Coghlan was attacked as "weak" by Harry Cohen, the Labour MP for Leyton, who also demanded the tightening up of vetting procedures on diplomats to stop other paedophiles being employed by the Government.

Jeremy Hanley, a Foreign Office minister, said in a letter to Mr Cohen that the Foreign Office had given "careful consideration" to the question of stripping the diplomat of his pension.

"We have concluded that, under the rules of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme, his activities do not constitute grounds for depriving him of his pension," Mr Hanley said. The pension will be based on Coghlan's final salary and years of service at the time of his dismissal and will remain frozen until he reaches the age of 60.

Coghlan, 54, was sacked after being sentenced for importing from Japan to Britain 109 pornographic videos involving children, en route to another posting, using the diplomatic bag.

Mr Hanley said that in the light of the Coghlan affair, the rules for transporting personal effects are to be changed to include pornography among the list of illustrative items which are prohibited from being carried in the diplomatic bag. All diplomats are warned that prohibited items cannot be taken by diplomatic bag, which can include containers covered by diplomatic privilege but previously were not specifically told to exclude pornography.

"We are not aware of the detailed contents of Mr Coghlan's videos impounded by HM Customs and Excise," Mr Hanley told Mr Cohen. "The material is held by HM Customs and Excise pending destruction."

There would be no changes in the vetting procedures although they had allowed a man of Coghlan's tastes into the diplomatic service, the minister said. "The vetting process cannot claim to be infallible and it relies to a large extent on an individual's co-operation and honesty, supported by the watchfulness of managers and colleagues, rather than on the sort of in-depth and ongoing investigation you may have in mind.

"Such investigation would inevitably be very intrusive and therefore unacceptable in terms of the liberty of the individual and invidious if applied only to members of the Diplomatic Service."

Mr Cohen is planning to protest over the issue in the Commons. He said: "This man has shamed Britain abroad but many people have lost their pensions for much lesser offences. By similar logic, perhaps the Foreign Office should be paying the spy George Blake his pension.

"They've added pornography to the list of prohibited materials for transporting but not to the list of purposes for security vetting. They should tighten up the security vetting."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in