Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Read all about it: low standard of libraries is damaging learning, says chief inspector

Sarah Cassidy Education Correspondent
Monday 07 February 2005 01:02 GMT
Comments

THE STANDARD of libraries in many primary and secondary schools is so poor that pupils' education is being damaged, David Bell, the chief inspector of schools, has warned.

Last week, his annual report warned that bad behaviour was becoming an increasing problem in schools and his latest comments round off a series of negative reports on the state of the education system.

Mr Bell said lack of space had forced many schools to have their "library" in an entrance hall or corridor, making it impossible for children to use it properly to help with their schoolwork. Many schools also use their libraries as part-time classrooms or study areas, depriving children of access to its books.

Inspectors said lack of funds meant many school libraries were unable to deliver the wide range of up-to-date books needed to support children's learning across the curriculum.

Mr Bell said many school libraries were failing to make a significant difference to pupils' learning."Under-funded, poorly stocked and unattractive libraries do not support pupils' study and lack the potential to encourage them to read more for pleasure," he said. "Reading is the cornerstone of learning but children need books to read. The school library is often a primary source of reading material for youngsters, as well as a vital learning resource, so it is essential that these problems are addressed."

Although many secondary schools have improved their library provision over the past few years, they were still found unsatisfactory in many primaries and secondaries. In these, the ability of pupils to use the library to aid their academic work was hampered because the school lacked the wide range of books needed to support the whole curriculum.

But inspectors also found schools had neglected their libraries over many years and there were other issues which should be easy for schools to resolve. Library areas were often drab and unattractive rooms which did not encourage pupils to visit. Books and other resources were often poorly organised, so children found it difficult to find what they needed. Teachers were sometimes to blame for failing to set children tasks which involved them using a library for independent research. The most effective school libraries were the ones which were well-managed and highly valued by the whole school community.

The best libraries often remain open and supervised for large parts of the school week, enabling pupils to visit for independent reading or research outside lessons. Most school libraries were staffed by keen librarians, some of whom are well qualified. Mr Bell called on schools and especially English departments to make better use of librarians' skills and involve them more directly in improving pupils' literacy. Although librarians often had a better knowledge of contemporary writing for children than teachers, they were rarely encouraged to use that knowledge to support and advise pupils.

Ofsted inspectors are not required to make judgements on libraries. But they do consider how libraries meet the needs of the curriculum and affect learning.

Last month, Mr Bell expressed concern about the number of independent Muslim schools failing to prepare their pupils as good citizens.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in