Britain exterminated evidence in Salisbury spy poisoning incident and benefited politically, Russian foreign minister claims

'It all looks very weird, you know,' Sergey Lavrov says

Britain exterminated evidence in Salisbury spy poisoning incident and benefited politically, Russian foreign minister claims

Britain has exterminated evidence in the Salisbury spy poisoning case and has benefited politically from the incident, Russia’s foreign minister has claimed.

Sergey Lavrov said the Government had “grossly manipulated” the chemical weapons watchdog when it orchestrated a change in the rules to allow it to identify who is responsible for attacks.

The minister described the poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia as a “very bad crime” but said the “inconsistencies” in the case were “very troubling”.

Boris Johnson recently mentioned that the place is being disinfected... six months or four months after the incident... and the policeman became miraculously fine... the Skripals became miraculously fine... people now talk about levelling the house where they lived... levelling the house of the policeman,” he told Channel 4 News.

“It all looks like consistent physical extermination of the evidence. Like the benches in the park were removed immediately and of course the video images when the policeman or special forces in special attire go to take a look at this bench, there’s people without any protection moving around.

“It all looks very weird, you know.”

Salisbury spy poisoning: Yulia Skripal says she is 'lucky to have survived' and would one day like to go home to Russia

Asked if he was accusing the British state of a cover-up, he replied: “I don’t exclude this, as long as they don’t give us information.”

“Certainly, the UK has benefited politically from what is going on and it’s an interesting situation whereby a country that is leaving the EU is determining the EU policy on Russia,” he added.

Mr Johnson led a successful bid at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to reform its remit in the wake of the Salisbury poisoning and repeated attacks in Syria.

Russia opposed the move and Mr Lavrov suggested it would pull out of the watchdog if the decision is not reversed, saying it would not be a “universal organisation”.

He claimed “all kind of tricks” were used to secure a majority in the vote on the changes at the OPCW, including “mobilising small countries that don’t have any representation in The Hague, paying for their travel expenses, paying for the hotel bills”.

A Government spokesman said: “These allegations are further examples of distraction from the Russian government, designed to confuse and detract from the issues at hand. This is a tactic we have seen Russia deploy consistently, from the downing of MH17, through the annexation of Crimea, to the use of chemical weapons in Salisbury and Syria.”

Press Association

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in