Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Apes can think far more like humans than we thought, study finds

The study could go some way to proving that the animals have a theory of mind – something that has previously thought to mark out humans as exceptional

Andrew Griffin
Thursday 06 October 2016 20:00 BST
Comments
Chimpanzee at Dvur Kralove zoo, Czech Republic
Chimpanzee at Dvur Kralove zoo, Czech Republic (Rex)

Kinds of understanding that were thought to exist only in humans might also be shared by apes, according to new research.

It’s long been known by humanity that the way we see the world and what it’s actually like are different things. But that knowledge – that a person might think things about reality that aren’t true – was thought to be held only by us, and to be a key part of the kinds of advanced consciousness that humans have.

New research with chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans, however, suggests that our distant relatives might be able to know the same thing. Apes can tell if you’re making a mistake, it has found.

That puts it on the same level of cognitive development as a human child. We tend to develop the kind of awareness that someone is wrong in early childhood, around the age of five.

When we do, we are on our way to developing the ability to fully comprehend what other people are thinking and feeling. Scientists call that idea Theory of Mind, and the development of it is one of the things previously thought to belong only to humans.

Some humans do lack the ability to infer things about other people’s thoughts and feelings, but that tends to be an early sign of autism.

"This cognitive ability is at the heart of so many human social skills," said Christopher Krupenye of Duke, who led the study along with comparative psychologist Fumihiro Kano of Kyoto University.

Having that ability allows us to get along with other people, help them out and figure our way around the world. They can be used negatively, too, to trick people into thinking things that aren’t the case.

And it was that skill for trickery that allowed scientists to test what apes know about what others are thinking.

In the study, scientists showed the apes two short videos.

In one, a person in a King Kong suit hides himself in one of two haystacks while a man watches. The man then leaves through a door, and the person in the King Kong suit runs away while he can’t see. The man then comes back in through the door and tries to find King Kong.

In the other video, the man returns to the scene after to find a stone that he saw being hidden by King Kong. But while the man was away, King Kong has taken the stone out of the box and left.

The scientists then watched the movement of the apes eyes while they were watching each of the videos. By doing so, they were able to make some approximation of what they were thinking.

If the apes pass they test, they’ll be able to tell that when the man comes back he will still want to look for the stone in the place where he last saw it – even though the apes have seen it being stolen and taken somewhere else. That requires the kind of awareness thought to belong only to humans, because it needs them to be able to tell that the man thinks something about the world that isn’t actually the case.

And in both of the tests, the ape looked for longest at the place where the man last saw the object. That led the scientists to conclude that they knew the man would think it was still there, even if it wasn’t.

The result of the test – referred to as the “false belief test” – were similar to those found in humans that are under the age of two.

“This is the first time that any nonhuman animals have passed a version of the false belief test," Krupenye said.

“If future experiments confirm these findings, they could lead scientists to rethink how deeply apes understand each other.”

The research was conducted by scientist at Duke University, Kyoto University and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. It will be published this week in the journal Science.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in