Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Florida sinkhole discovery suggests humans lived in America 1,500 years earlier than previously thought

Archaelogical consensus held that humans first lived in the Americas 13,000 years ago, but the new finds cast doubt on this

Will Worley
Monday 16 May 2016 16:16 BST
Comments
Neil Puckett, a Ph.D. student from Texas A&M University involved in the excavations, surfaces with the limb bone of a juvenile mastodon at the sinkhole
Neil Puckett, a Ph.D. student from Texas A&M University involved in the excavations, surfaces with the limb bone of a juvenile mastodon at the sinkhole (Brendan Fenerty/Handout via REUTERS )

Archaeologists investigating a Florida sinkhole have unearthed evidence suggesting humans lived in the Americas around 14,500 years ago.

On the Aucilla River, near Tallahassee, the 8m deep Page-Ladson sinkhole was found to contain a stone knife and animal bones which had apparently been marked by humans.

The finds add further weight to arguments against the theory that the Americas were first populated by the ‘Clovis’ people 13,000 years ago, whic has been the mainstream archaeological consensus for many years.

The team, led by Dr Jessi Halligan, an anthropology professor of Florida State University, found a ‘biface’ – a rudimentary knife-like object made from stone with a blade chipped into one side. “There is absolutely no way it is not made by people," Dr Halligan told the Smithsonian Magazine. "There is no way that's a natural artefact in any shape or form."

Bones of a mastodon – a mammoth-like creature which became extinct more than 10,000 years ago – were also found at the site, which was believed to have been a watering hole in the period the artefacts date from. The bones were engraved with groove-like marks which the team said were made by people, perhaps while dismembering a carcass for meat.

Divers investigate the site, eight metres down (S. Joy/CSFA via AP)

The site would have been an ideal hunting ground, according to the researchers, and attracted other creatures too – canine bones were also discovered, though it is unknown if the animals were companions to the humans or just scavengers.

The findings, published in the journal Science Advances, present “unequivocal” evidence of a pre-Clovis population in the Americas, according to senior researcher, Dr Michael Waters of Texas A&M University. “We have clear artefacts, they were excavated meticulously, and they were in place,” Dr Waters told National Geographic.

He continued: “They were in a solid geological context, covered by four meters of sediment, and covered by a shell layer that sealed the complete deposit, and itself dated to 14,400 years ago. We have 71 radiocarbon dates throughout the entire sequence. If people don’t believe this site, they’re not going to believe anything.”

Surface vessels at the excavation site (CSFA via AP)

Dr Michael Faught, an underwater archaeologist and reviewer of the team’s report, said the findings are “unassailable”.

Until recently, it was considered extremely controversial to dispute the Clovis theory – that the Americas were first populated by Paleo-Indians around 13,000 years ago. Clovis is the name of a town in New Mexico where early stone tools were found in the early 20th century.

"Fifteen years ago, if you proposed a pre-Clovis site, you had to expect that everybody thought you were a quack," Dr Halligan said. “Ten years ago, some people would have been supportive and most people would have thought you were a quack."

She added that the findings are a “big deal” because “it means we were wrong about Clovis being first and we need to start figuring out what the real story is".

The Clovis narrative held that the first people to populate the Americas entered the continent from Alaska.

However, this theory now seems less viable, as ice sheets which covered the north of the American continent are only believed to have melted into an ‘ice-free’ corridor around 14,000 years ago, 500 years after the estimated date of the new discoveries.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in