Mummified boy buried in unmarked grave 400 years ago identified as son of powerful Austrian count

Toddler was found in aristocratic family crypt, where conditions allowed for natural mummification

Researchers found that the child, although born to a wealthy family, was malnourished and sick with pneumonia (SWNS)

A ‘virtual autopsy’ has identified a 17th-century mummified toddler as the first-born son of a powerful Austrian count.

Researchers found the child, despite being born to a wealthy family, was malnourished and sick with pneumonia when he died about 400 years ago.

A team based in Germany examined the mummy, using state-of-the-art science alongside historical records to shed new light on Renaissance childhood.

The boy was found in an aristocratic Austrian family crypt, where conditions allowed for natural mummification, preserving soft tissue that contained critical information about his life and death.

Surprisingly, it was the only unidentified body in the crypt, buried in an unmarked wooden coffin instead of the elaborate metal coffins reserved for the other members of the family buried there.

The research team, led by Dr Andreas Nerlich of the Academic Clinic Munich-Bogenhausen, conducted the virtual autopsy and radiocarbon testing, and also examined family records and key material clues from the burial, to try to understand who the child was and what his short life looked like.

A team of researchers based in Germany examined the mummy, using state-of-the-art science (SWNS)

Dr Nerlich said: “This is only one case, but as we know that the early infant death rates generally were very high at that time, our observations may have considerable impact in the over-all life reconstruction of infants even in higher social classes.”

The team used CT scanning to measure bone lengths and looked at tooth eruption and the formation of long bones to determine that the child was around one year old when he died.

The soft tissue showed that the child was a boy and overweight for his age, so his parents were able to feed him well – but his bones told a different story.

The boy was found in an aristocratic Austrian family crypt (SWNS)

Dr Nerlich said: “The child’s ribs had become malformed in the pattern called a rachitic rosary, which is usually seen in severe rickets or scurvy.

“Although he received enough food to put on weight, he was still malnourished.

“While the typical bowing of the bones seen in rickets was absent, this may have been because he did not walk or crawl.”

Since the virtual autopsy revealed that he had inflammation of the lungs characteristic of pneumonia, and children with rickets are more vulnerable to pneumonia, the research team believe that nutritional deficiency may even have contributed to his early death.

The child was around one year old when he died (SWNS)

Dr Nerlich said: “The combination of obesity along with a severe vitamin-deficiency can only be explained by a generally ‘good’ nutritional status along with an almost complete lack of sunlight exposure.

“We have to reconsider the living conditions of high aristocratic infants of previous populations.”

However, although Dr Nerlich and his team had established a probable cause of death, the question of the child’s identity remained.

Deformation of his skull suggested that his simple wooden coffin was not quite large enough for the child.

The research team believe that nutritional deficiency may even have contributed to the boy’s early death (SWNS)

However, specialist examination of his clothing showed that he had been buried in a long, hooded coat made of expensive silk.

He was also buried in a crypt exclusively reserved for the powerful Counts of Starhemberg, who buried their title-holders - mostly first-born sons - and their wives there.

Dr Nerlich said that meant that the child was most likely a first-born son of a Count of Starhemberg.

Radiocarbon dating of a skin sample suggested he was buried between 1550 and 1635, while historical records of the crypt’s management indicated that his burial probably took place after the crypt’s renovation around 1600. He was the only infant buried in the crypt.

Dr Nerlich said: “We have no data on the fate of other infants of the family.

“According to our data, the infant was most probably [the count’s] first-born son after erection of the family crypt, so special care may have been applied.

“This meant that there was only one likely candidate for the little boy in the silk coat: Reichard Wilhelm, whose grieving family buried him alongside his grandfather and namesake Reichard von Starhemberg.”

The findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Medicine