Government minister ‘shocked’ by lack of women serving on JCVI

‘Maybe all scientific committees that make decisions about women’s health should have a gender balance,’ says health minister Nadine Dorries

Samuel Lovett
Science Correspondent
Wednesday 21 July 2021 00:18
Comments

A government minister has raised concern over the lack of women on the UK’s vaccine watchdog, saying she was “shocked” to hear about the overwhelming majority of men sitting on the committee.

Health minister Nadine Dorries said pregnant women have not been prioritised for Covid-19 vaccine due to the strong male make-up of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).

The JCVI advises the government on its vaccine strategy, having most recently recommended that all clinically vulnerable children aged 12 and over should be inoculated with the Pfizer jab.

On the government's JCVI webpage, it lists 16 members - of which 12 are men and four are women. A further four women are listed as "co-opted members" for "implementation matters".

Ms Dorries said that scientific committees taking decisions about women's health should have a gender balance.

Speaking during a Westminster Hall debate on reducing baby loss, Ms Dorries told Labour MP Sarah Owen: "She made the point that the government needs to ensure that all pregnant women are vaccinated.

"My daughter is 32 weeks pregnant, so no-one has been more aware of that than me, but I am afraid that politicians do not make clinical decisions, and the government is not the JCVI - the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation - it is completely independent. They decide who is vaccinated.

"But I would tell (Ms Owen) that I was quite shocked to discover - after constantly asking why pregnant women aren't being prioritised - I just took a glance at the make-up of the JCVI, to discover that it is made up of 14 men and three women.

"So I am unsurprised at the JCVI not emphasising or prioritising pregnant women for vaccination.

"Again, that is a point I am raising within the department and in particular with the women's health strategy - because maybe all scientific committees that make decisions about women's health should have a gender balance."

There is also a Covid-19 sub-committee of the JCVI, containing 13 men and six women.

Out of the 87 experts serving on the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, only 29 are women - roughly 25 per cent.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in