The Independent’s journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

Dinosaur parasites found filled with blood and trapped in amber

Newly discovered fossilised ticks sucked the blood of prehistoric reptiles nearly 100 million years ago

Fossilised tick shows relationship between parasites and dinosaurs

In a scenario reminiscent of Jurassic Park, palaeontologists have found dinosaur parasites – one of which is filled with blood – trapped in amber.

The parasites have been identified as a new species of tick, named Deinocroton draculi or “Dracula’s terrible tick”.

These ticks would have sucked dinosaur blood almost 100 million years ago.

The scientists found one of the ticks encased in a piece of amber – tree resin that has hardened and fossilised – and grasping a feather.

It was the feather that indicated the preferred dinosaur targets for these prehistoric parasites.

“The fossil record tells us that feathers like the one we have studied were already present on a wide range of theropod dinosaurs,” said Dr Ricardo Pérez-de la Fuente, a palaeobiologist at Oxford University Museum of Natural History and one of the authors of the study describing the parasites.

“Although we can’t be sure what kind of dinosaur the tick was feeding on, the mid-Cretaceous age of the Burmese amber confirms that the feather certainly did not belong to a modern bird,” he said.

The 99 million year-old amber fossil containing a dinosaur feather accompanied by a tick

Birds only appeared later in the age of the dinosaurs, when some feathered dinosaurs evolved into modern-day birds.

The fossils are the oldest known blood-sucking parasites identified, and represent the first direct evidence of ticks parasitising dinosaurs.

One of the ticks the palaeontologists found was swollen to eight times its normal size with blood.

While comparisons with the book and movie franchise are tempting, any Jurassic Park-style cloning of dinosaurs from blood found in amber won’t be possible with these specimens.

DNA does not preserve easily, so all attempts to extract it from amber millions of years after fossilisation so far have been unsuccessful.

The condition of these specimens also makes it difficult to analyse the blood and determine the creature to which it belonged.

“Assessing the composition of the blood meal inside the bloated tick is not feasible because, unfortunately, the tick did not become fully immersed in resin and so its contents were altered by mineral deposition,” said University of Barcelona researcher Dr Xavier Delclòs, one of the authors of the Nature Communications paper.

However, the scientists did find fragments of the larvae of some even smaller creatures, skin beetles, attached to the bodies of the ancient ticks.

The presence of these beetles, which are often found in birds’ nests today, provide further evidence that these creatures were feeding on feathered dinosaurs.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in