Calls for stricter drone regulations after study finds technical glitches to blame for most crashes

Experts say it is 'essential' that safety regulations keep pace with the rapid changes in drone technology and usage

Ian Johnston
Science Correspondent
Tuesday 23 August 2016 16:45
Comments
A drone carrying two hacksaw blades, a cellphone, cigarettes, cigars, marijuana, methamphetamine and heroin, crashed at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, police said last year
A drone carrying two hacksaw blades, a cellphone, cigarettes, cigars, marijuana, methamphetamine and heroin, crashed at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, police said last year

The majority of drone accidents were caused by technical problems rather than errors by the operator, according to the first study to investigate the issue.

Researchers in Australia found that a problem with the equipment was the reason behind 64 per cent of more than 150 incidents around the world between 2006 and 2016.

They said it was “essential” for regulations to keep pace with the rapid developments in drone usage and technology.

In April, a pilot reported that a suspected drone had struck his British Airways A320 at 1,700ft above Richmond Park in London.

However Transport Minister Robert Goodwill later claimed the “drone” could have been a plastic bag and warned against “over-reacting” as he dismissed calls for tighter controls of drones.

One of the researchers, Dr Graham Wild, of RMIT University in Melbourne, said their findings showed the need for better airworthiness regulations and the mandatory reporting of all incidents involving drones.

“Understanding what happens to drones, even those that don't cause damage to people or property, is essential to improve safety,” he said.

“Large transport category aircraft, such as those from a Boeing or Airbus, are required to have triple redundant systems for their communications.

“But drones don’t and some of the improvements that have reduced the risks in those aircraft could also be used to improve the safety of drones.”

The study, described in a paper in the journal Aerospace, found that the most common problem that led to an accident was a break in the communication signal between the pilot and the drone.

They called for drones to be covered by regulations similar to those which govern commercial aircraft.

“Drones are being used for a wide range of tasks now and there are a lot of day-to-day activities that people want to use them for – delivering pizzas and packages, taking photos, geosurveying, firefighting, and search and rescue,” Dr Wild said.

“It’s essential that our safety regulations keep up with this rapidly-growing industry.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in