Election of Prince Andrew angers scientists at Royal Society

 

Kate Morris
Monday 06 May 2013 01:55
Comments
The Duke was elected with the support of 80 per cent of those who voted
The Duke was elected with the support of 80 per cent of those who voted

The Royal Society has defended its election of the Duke of York as a fellow despite some of its members branding him "over-colourful" and lacking a scientific background.

Some fellows were in revolt over the Duke's appointment which saw him secure votes from 11 per cent of members, according to The Sunday Times. They were also unhappy at the Royal Society's historic practice of appointing royalty as fellows.

One critic, David Colquhoun, a fellow and professor of pharmacology at University College London, told the paper: "The Royal Society was founded to advocate the idea that science is what matters, not deference to authority. The exception to that seems to be deference to royal blood, but it is taking deference too far to elect Prince Andrew.

"The citation sent to me by the Royal Society mentioned none of his unsavoury history."

A spokesman for the society said that the Duke was elected on the basis of what he was doing for science, and the Royal Society.

"The Duke is active in two areas," he said. "One, in supporting young British scientists, in particular our University Research Fellowships, and secondly he has been active in supporting our Year of Science and Industry. The Duke has been very helpful in trying to help make links between academics and industry."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in