Earth’s first-known giant rapidly evolved into sea monsters as big as whales, study finds

Giant ichthyosaur took only fraction of time it took whales to evolve into their ginormous size

Vishwam Sankaran
Friday 24 December 2021 06:50
Comments
<p>Skull of the first giant creature to ever inhabit the Earth, the ichthyosaur “Cymbospondylus youngorum” currently on display at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHM)</p>

Skull of the first giant creature to ever inhabit the Earth, the ichthyosaur “Cymbospondylus youngorum” currently on display at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHM)

Scientists analysing the two-metre-long skull fossil of a newly discovered species of giant ichthyosaur – a behemoth marine reptile that ruled the seas during the time of the dinosaurs – have found that it rapidly evolved to become as big as whales.

The findings shed light on how present-day whales became the largest animals to ever inhabit the Earth, say the scientists including those from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County in the US.

While it took whales about 9 per cent of their 55-million-year history to evolve into the ocean giants we know today, the researchers say ichthyosaurs evolved to similar sizes within the first 1 per cent of their 150-million-year history on Earth.

“Ichthyosaurs derive from an as yet unknown group of land-living reptiles and were air-breathing themselves,” study lead author Martin Sander, who is a paleontologist at the University of Bonn, explained in a statement.

Evolving fins and hydrodynamic body-shapes that are seen in both fish and whales, these giant reptiles swam the ancient oceans for nearly the entirety of the Age of Dinosaurs, the scientists say.

“From the first skeleton discoveries in southern England and Germany over 250 years ago, these ‘fish-saurians’ were among the first large fossil reptiles known to science, long before the dinosaurs, and they have captured the popular imagination ever since,” Dr Sander added.

In the new study, published in the journal Science on Thursday, scientists analysed a giant ichthyosaur fossil excavated from a rock unit called the Fossil Hill Member in the Augusta Mountains of Nevada.

The well-preserved skull, along with part of the backbone, shoulder, and forefin, dates back to the Middle Triassic period – 247-237 million years ago – and represents the earliest case of an ichthyosaur reaching epic proportions as big as a large sperm whale at more than 17 meters (55.78 feet) long, the study noted.

The new species, the scientists found, stalked the oceans only about three million years after the first ichthyosaurs got their fins wet, suggesting they got humongous in an amazingly short time.

Based on the elongated snout and conical teeth, they say C youngorum may have preyed on squid, fish, and may have also hunted smaller and juvenile marine reptiles due to its size.

Ichthyosaur fossil surrounded by the shells of ammonites, the food source that possibly fueled their growth to huge

The researchers say the marine food webs of this time period could support such massive creatures, despite the absence of many primary producers following the Permian extinction event 252 million years ago which wiped out nearly 96 per cent of all the sea-dwelling species of the time.

The study also found that while both modern-day whales and ichthyosaurs have evolved very large body sizes, their respective evolutionary trajectories toward gigantism were different.

While whales took much longer to reach their size limits, Ichthyosaurs had an initial boom, becoming giants early on in their evolutionary history, the scientists say, adding that they both relied on exploiting niches in the food chain to make it really big.

“Ichthyosaur history tells us ocean giants are not guaranteed features of marine ecosystems, which is a valuable lesson for all of us in the Anthropocene, especially if we want to sustain the presence of the surviving ocean giants among us that contribute to our own well-being,” Lene Delsett and Nicholas Pyenson from the National Museum of Natural History write in a linked commentary on the study.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in