Men donate more to charity when the fundraiser is an attractive women, says study
Men will give donate significantly more if they see that other men have already given large amounts and when the fundraiser is an attractive woman
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
When men donate to charity it’s not so much the giving that counts but the desire to compete with other men for the attentions of an attractive woman, according to a study of charitable donations.
Men will give significantly more money to charity if they see that other men have already given large amounts and when the fundraiser who is asking for the money is an attractive woman, researchers have discovered.
Women on the other hand appear to be unaffected by the looks of the male fundraisers asking for money, which has led scientists to believe that there is a fundamental biological difference between the sexes when it comes to the motivations behind charitable donations.
The findings of the study have put a new slant on the seemingly ubiquitous phenomenon of online fundraising through charitable websites such as JustGiving, which has produced its own complex etiquette surrounding the thorny question of how much to donate, and whether to do it anonymously.
The study analysed nearly 700 fundraising webpages from the London 2014 marathon where the picture of the fundraiser was published, and whose gender was identified so that their attractiveness could be verified independently by four reviewers of the opposite sex using a 10-point score.
In each case, the donations made to the fundraiser were posted in sequence, along the name of the donor unless they had opted for anonymity, which other donors were able to see before deciding on their own donation.
“This creates a potential tournament in which donors may compete by responding to how much others have given,” said Professor Sarah Smith of the University of Bristol, who co-authored the study published in the on-line journal Current Biology.
“Fundraising pages provide a fascinating real-life laboratory for looking at charity donations….now we see that the response depends, albeit subconsciously, on the fundraiser’s attractiveness,” Professor Smith said.
The analysis showed that people on average gave about £10 more to a fundraiser after seeing other peoples’ large donations, but when large donations were made by men to attractive female fundraisers, subsequent donations from men increased a further £28 on average.
“We don’t think that males are seeing large donations from other males to attractive female fundraisers, and thinking ‘Yeah, I’ll give more than him because she will find me more attractive’,” said Nichola Raihani of University College London, the lead author of the study.
“I think it’s more likely that humans have an evolved psychology that motivates us to behave in ways that would have been, on average, adaptive in our evolutionary past, and may still be nowadays also,” Dr Raihani said.
The scientists suggest that men are unwittingly displaying signals of their generosity and wealth, which in evolutionary terms are perceived by women as attractive features for a potential sexual partner. Men, on the other hand, are more influenced by physical attractiveness.
“Men put a higher emphasis on signals of fertility such as youth and hip-to-waist ratio, while women tend to put greater stress on resources such as wealth and social status,” Dr Raihani said.
“One way that men can signal these resources is to make an ostentatious display of wealth, such as making big donations to these fundraising websites,” she said.
“People are really generous and their reasons for giving to charity are generally not self-serving but it doesn’t preclude their motives from having evolved to benefit them in some way…the psychological reason for doing something does not necessarily have to be the same as the evolved reason,” she added.
The researchers also found that bigger donations on average were made to fundraisers whose pictures showed them smiling compared with unsmiling fundraisers, and that large donations tended to elicit further large donations.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments