Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 search: Inmarsat - a UK satellite firm - broke new ground in hunt for missing Malaysia Airlines flight

 

A crew member on board an RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft looks at a radar screen whilst searching for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 over the Indian Ocean
A crew member on board an RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft looks at a radar screen whilst searching for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 over the Indian Ocean

While planes and ships have scoured the oceans and speculation has ebbed and flowed about the fate of Flight MH370, scientists at a British satellite company have spent the past fortnight crunching vast amounts of data to provide the first solid information relating to the fate of the Boeing 777 and the 239 people onboard.

Inmarsat, which was set up 35 years ago as a not-for-profit organisation to provide communications for shipping, and has since become one of the world’s largest satellite operators, on Monday revealed the grim conclusion of its calculations – that the plane had plunged into the freezing waters of the Indian Ocean some 1,500 miles south-west of Australia.

Using data from “pings” sent by MH370 to an Inmarsat satellite after the plane lost contact on 9 March, the company had established within four days that it had travelled along one of two vast arcs heading north across southern and central Asia or south across a vast expanse of ocean.

Since then it has undertaken a groundbreaking exercise in analysing data to refine that information to try to establish which of the two arcs MH370 travelled along and where its perplexing flight might have finally come to an end.

Using a technique described by the Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak as never having been used before, Inmarsat used the doppler effect – the change in frequency of a transmission due to the movement of a satellite or aircraft – as the basis for a method of modelling the particular path of a jet.

When this data was compared with data for the known paths of other aircraft, it formed the basis for establishing the likely route taken by MH370.

Chris McLauglin, a senior vice-president at Inmarsat, told Sky News: “What we did two weeks ago was say it could be north or it could be south, and what we’ve done is refined that with the signals we got from other aircraft.

“Previous aircraft provided a pattern, and that pattern to the south is virtually what we got in our suggested estimate.”

The company said it was able to provide a location with a margin of error of about 100 miles but could not be more precise because the satellite which had been receiving MH370’s pings was a 1990s model and was not fitted with the GPS capability that would narrow the location to a handful of metres.

Dr Simon Boxall, an oceanographer with Southampton University, told BBC News: “They’ve probably crammed a year’s worth of research into maybe a couple of weeks… Technologically it’s really quite astounding.”

READ MORE: SPOTTER PLANES FAIL TO FIND ANY SIGN OF JET
DEBRIS IN INDIAN OCEAN SPOTTED BY SATELLITE

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in