Everyone fits into just one of four personality types, study finds
The biggest group of people is envious, the researchers found
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Everyone fits into four different personality types, according to a new study – and people are mostly likely to be envious.
New research published in the journal Science Advances looked at 541 people, exploring how they responded to hundreds of different social games.
And it found that people only really responded in ways that put them in four different groups: people who are envious, optimistic, pessimistic or trusting. And more people are envious than anything else, they found.
The study worked by asking people about a range of different situations, each of which involved hunting.
So, for example, people might be told that two people can hunt for deer by working together, or they can go it alone and catch rabbits. The respondents were then told to decide which of the things they’d do.
Someone who is envious would look for rabbits because they’d be able to do more for themselves, for instance. Optimists would work together because that’s the best option for all. The pessimist would opt for rabbits because there’s more chance of at least catching something. And a trusting person would opt for co-operation, working together to catch the deer.
And 30 per cent of the people in the study were envious. The largest group was mostly looking to triumph and beat the other hunter – irrespective of whether that actually led to better results all round.
Only a small fraction of people didn’t fit into any of the groups at all, despite the varied range of questions, according to the researchers from Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
The researchers said that the study was inspired by the fact that many people find using games to be a useful way of finding out about human behaviour. But most of those studies just look at one situation and often one specific part of the population to work out how people act.
As such, it is hard to generalise about people’s behaviour and understand how consistent it is across different situations.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments